Steve Brandt is correct in his article about the Black and minority
community welcoming a plan to create affordable home-ownership.  I sometimes
believe the politicians and developers look at Black people, and Native
people, as a permanent underclass to be exploited as renters and with
poverty programs but never to be sustainably helped.  Helping to keep poor
people poor is NOT helping poor people

The road to success for most "new" immigrant groups is no secret.  It has
been and is by acquiring homeownership, and then business ownership.  The
pseudo-liberals give lip service to empowering people but they join with the
good old boy conservatives to remove that chance.  It is also no secret why
Black people and Native people represent so small a per-capita homeownership
rate.  They have been systematically and institutionally prevented from
equal access to homeownership. Their roles have been defined as "Renter" and
poor person, and how dare someone try to disturb that status quo?  How dare
the neighborhood representatives on the NRP Policy Board try to empower some
poor people?

The eight Council Members and the Mayor should feel shame today for their
elitism. But probably they just feel smug because they slapped those darn
poor people and neighborhoods back down where they belong. Heck, before you
knew what was happening you might have had poor minority people buying
houses out where they live.  While this explains why the "elite three" voted
the way they did, what about the CM's such as Zimmerman and Samuels.  What
political payoff caused those supposed neighborhood people to desert their
neighborhoods? Was it no more than joining those "elite three" because they
feared losing control of that money to the neighborhoods and poor people?
Those two and a few others have some explaining to do.  Of course they are
probably too important to explain their motives to the neighborhoods that
elected them. While pretending to be uxorious of the neighborhoods, could
they in reality have joined the condescending elite their actions seem to
indicate.

I always thought Peter McLaughlin was too valuable at Hennepin County, and
we did not want him to change jobs. After that vote maybe we should look
again.  Perhaps it is time to start recruiting a whole new batch of
political candidates.  Perhaps ones who actually support the neighborhood
people rather than just making campaign promises. Mark Stenglein is another
politician who voted to support neighborhoods and poor people. He and Peter
McLaughlin are politicians who put wise housing decisions and planning ahead
of the political fluff and developer cronies that some present City
politicians favor.

Hope to see many of you at the Capital at noon.

Jim Graham,
Ventura Village


>Things that matter most should never be at the mercy of things, which
matter least.
- Johann von Goethe





TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.

________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to