http://www.dcwatch.com/issues/privacy07.htm
has an excellent write-up related to a proposal to implement cameras in DC. While I disagree with some small pieces of the author's positions the key points he makes are salient: 1) Cameras are not effective in fighting crime 2) Cameras are a diversion from more effective crime prevention techniques 3) Cameras can be used to invade privacy (and here is where we diverge somewhat-- I don't believe we can expect to be "anonymous" or "private" in the midst of a large public area)-- the concern that the tech will be expanded to thermal scanning, infrared, or facial recognition is of concern, however) 4) Cameras are subject to abuse While I consider 1 & 2 to be of great importance, especially in a time of belt-tightening, we need to be wary of false efficiencies, the abuse is of concern... and the public's ability to see how these cameras are being used-- not just when the"tapes" turn up at trials, but all day, every day-- is the only deterrent to some of the known and recurrent abuses that already occur with existing camera systems. The cameras are already everywhere (in the hands of private corporations, located on private property). Will be allowed to watch too? -Michael Libby, Cleveland neighborhood/North Mpls TEMPORARY REMINDER: 1. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. 2. If you don't like what's being discussed here, don't complain - change the subject (Mpls-specific, of course.) ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
