Steve wrote: As far as knocking Paul Ostrow around regarding this issue..... I am hardly a backer of Paul, but it isn't the job of the city council member to micro-manage businesses. If a business wants to move in and are doing so within the letter of the law, they should be able to do so. The option of the council member having to get involved any more than making sure that the law is followed, leads to corruption and influence peddling. Be aware that I'm not accusing President Ostrow of such things, but I'm saying that a council member that requires businesses to bend a knee in front of the alter of the council does cause these problems. Meeting the needs, wants, and desires of the residents of the area will prove it's self out by the business being able to conduct business. Steve Sumner Waite Park -----
Councilperson Ostrow has set up an informational meeting on June 17th to hear the wants needs and desires of his residents. He obviously wants to hear from his neighbors. Doesn't every business have to get permits to operate in a neighborhood? Especially if there is going to be housing and other establishments torn down to facilitate it? I just like living in a part of the city where small businesses can start and not have to worry, like Block E did, about filling space with Red Lobsters and only chain stores and restaurants who can afford massive investments. Allysen Hoberg Audobon Park -----Original Message----- From: Steve Sumner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 3:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Org Subject: [Mpls] An Even More Destructive Cub Proposal for Northeast I have lived in Northeast for most of my life, and I don't think that Cub moving onto Central would be "destructive". I like all the small businesses that are on Central also, but know that it is badly in need of some big name business to move in and take up shop there. One only needs to look at Grand Ave in Saint Paul to realize the potential Central Ave has. However, I am not in favor of a city backing the deal. I feel that business can make money, and have many advantages in making such a move onto a road such as Central Ave without government backing. Just take a look at Target in North Minneapolis as an example of a failure in government financial help. Target won't be living out the TIFF district plan that they signed up for if they move. As far as knocking Paul Ostrow around regarding this issue..... I am hardly a backer of Paul, but it isn't the job of the city council member to micro-manage businesses. If a business wants to move in and are doing so within the letter of the law, they should be able to do so. The option of the council member having to get involved any more than making sure that the law is followed, leads to corruption and influence peddling. Be aware that I'm not accusing President Ostrow of such things, but I'm saying that a council member that requires businesses to bend a knee in front of the alter of the council does cause these problems. Meeting the needs, wants, and desires of the residents of the area will prove it's self out by the business being able to conduct business. Steve Sumner Waite Park TEMPORARY REMINDER: 1. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. 2. If you don't like what's being discussed here, don't complain - change the subject (Mpls-specific, of course.) ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls TEMPORARY REMINDER: 1. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. 2. If you don't like what's being discussed here, don't complain - change the subject (Mpls-specific, of course.) ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
