In contrast to most of the posters to this List, I'm happy with 80-90% of
what came out of St Paul this year.  It was a heckuva session.  But one
stinker that made it through the process was the Pledge of Allegiance bill.
They want to force another generation of kids to go through this dumb
ritual.  But I believe the Mpls School Board can keep this out of our
schools.  That should be an annual ritual of the Board.

I recited this thing every school day for most of my childhood.  The only
thing I learned from it is that promises aren't something you plan to do,
they are something you mouth every morning as part of the day's sacraments.
You don't even need to understand the promise; the important thing is to
repeat it as often as possible.  And there is no way any kid could
"understand" the Pledge, because it is mostly meaningless babble.  I'll
quickly go over the words, to demonstrate that it doesn't make sense.

"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America,..."

What the heck does this mean?  Am I promising to do whatever the flag tells
me to do?

"...and to the republic for which it stands,..."

This makes a little more sense, but is extremely general.  Does this mean I
have to do whatever someone from the US government tells me to do?  Or just
obey all the laws passed?  Does committing civil disobedience break this
promise?  Or does it just mean I won't conspire with a foreign government
against the US govt?  I bet every person asked would interpret it
differently, so what's the point of such a "unifying" ritual?

"...one nation, under God,..."

It is ironic that a promise of loyalty to the US includes a clause that is
so blatantly unconstitutional.

"...indivisible,..."

First of all, what kid understands the word, or what it's about?  I think a
teacher actually tried to explain the word to us when I was a kid, but I had
no true cognition of it until I later studied the Civil War.  Besides, this
is supposed to be part of a pledge.  What am I pledging here?  Not to secede
 from the union?

"...with liberty and justice for all."

My question is what is with liberty and justice?  This clause makes no
grammatical sense -- it's just tacked onto the end because it sounds noble.
I like liberty and justice as much as the next guy, but could you tell me
what I'm promising here?

If the School Board needs a substitute to protect themselves from
accusations of being unpatriotic, then they could have a song every morning
like "America the Beautiful" or "This Land is Your Land."  Anyway, a song is
more effective at instilling a sense of belonging than an incomprehensible
oath.  And unlike an oath, a song doesn't need to make sense -- it just
needs to have a nice melody.

Mark V Anderson
Bancroft


TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
2. If you don't like what's being discussed here, don't complain - change the subject 
(Mpls-specific, of course.)

________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to