Ethan Jewett's proposals seem a lot more
levelheaded and practical than the usual talk
about bikes here, but I want to add some
comments. Bike lanes are somewhat of a help,
though my own experience biking is that turning
cars create danger for bike lanes because they
always have to turn through the bike lane. And as
we know too well, Minnesota drivers do a lot of
things pretty impetuously and without warning.
So, my own thought after driving and biking on
26th and 28th is that they might think about some
re-engineering of the lanes.  They already have a
problem with changing the number and location of
lanes.  I'm sure if they rethought how those
lanes work, they could work bike lanes in so they
would be safer. But they would NEVER be really
safe. I still think bikes are safer on streets
that have less traffic and traffic that moves
slower.  Cars are driven on these one-way streets
as if they were some kind of expressway.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The views expressed on community candidates for
chief are welcome.  But I'm waiting to hear the
other side of the story from people who know it.
I guess I'm biased in favor of outsiders for the
simple reason that kissing up should never make
you chief, no matter who (politicians, business,
etc) you kiss up to.  I suppose the Police
Federation leadership  has THEIR wish list, too.
And I'm especially keen that not be taken by our
politicans as the roadmap to a better city.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I, too, think MPS needs to look at how much good,
if any, small class sizes have done.  Small class
sizes are always a good thing.  One-to-one would
be great in a perfect world. But if you look at
key indicators of success before the referendum
compared to now, if the small class sizes haven't
achieved what was promised to voters in the
referendum, then any fool can see that there is
still a problem out there.  Now, if
administration is part of that problem, one would
expect the administration to try to sweep things
under the rug.  But that is not saying the real
problem is administration.  Because there's
little evidence that charter schools, freed of
that administration, have done that well, either.
Perhaps the problem is simply a student body
without the life circumstances allowing learning.
At least among those failing. As I've previously
said, I know many students who have succeeded
marvelously.  So there is one district here that
allows people to excel and to fail.  Why are some
failing with the same instruction as the
successes.

Whether the Super thinks we voters are "naive" or
not, she needs to get serious about an
explanation for this.  I wouldn't mind at all if
she pointed out all the environmental things that
have changed since we graduated more high
schoolers than anywhere in the nation.  And then
maybe society can start implementing a few
remedies (like Head Start, nutrition, or
whatever, but I sure wish we could reinvent the
settlement house movement and take it AWAY from
the schools!)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
We do have a "finance council". The Board of
Estimate and Taxation. I think that's where they
arranged the 8% cap.  Maybe the city finance
director can jump in and confirm that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In terms of honest books, anything that does not
instruct students should be listed as overhead.
And there should be generally-accepted accounting
standards (not Arthur Andersen-style) so that
school districts can be compared.  I kind of
wonder where Pat Awada is on this.  It is her job
to INSURE acceptable books for government bodies.




=====
Jim Mork
Cooper Neighborhood
Longfellow Community
Minneapolis
A great town, which can and WILL BE
greater!

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
2. If you don't like what's being discussed here, don't complain - change the subject 
(Mpls-specific, of course.)

________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to