David Brauer wrote:

"I don't think this is correct, if Vickie is referring to the use of
the Hilton Fund to add monies to NRP above Common Project revenues
(which are
ongoing tax revenues after paying off debt, not debt)."

Vicky replies:

Can you prove that the Hilton bonds (debts) were ever paid in full?  I
think that they were bunched in with a lot of other unpaid debts into
the "Common Project."

The "Common Project" is just a bunch of Tax Increment Districts that
didn't, couldn't, or wouldn't, pay off their debts.  They were bundled
together into a big lump of debt and re-financed for twenty more
years - robbing the general fund of $400 million.

Once a tax increment district repays its debts, the property tax
collections from that TIF district are supposed to flow into the
general fund.  The Common Project scheme simply kept money out of the
general fund by continuing to divert it to the MCDA.  In the case of
Cedar-Riverside, it's been going on for 35 years.  When I pay my
property taxes, only 5% goes to the general fund.  The other 95% goes
to the MCDA.  The money then gets passed from hand to hand until it
finally disappears.

If you can prove that the Hilton bonds were repaid - I will accept
your theory.  However, the "Hilton Fund" is just a savings account -
cash that belongs to the taxpayers.  The City Council obviously thinks
that it is more important to fund NRP (for popularity no doubt) than
to fund the Police Department.

Until we elect some people with courage and financial discipline, our
debts continue to grow and grow.  So does the interest expense.  And
so do property taxes.  Not very smart in the long run.

Vicky Heller
North Oaks


TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
2. If you don't like what's being discussed here, don't complain - change the subject 
(Mpls-specific, of course.)

________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to