STRIB EDITORIAL "Jennings comes to the superintendency believing that the 
course set by Johnson is the right one for producing lasting improvement in 
student performance. In that sense, he represents stability. But he is also capable 
of challenging sacred cows, including the teachers' union, in order to more 
effectively produce results."

Unfortunately we got about the same results under Johnson that we got with 
the Superintendent she replaced, Peter Hutchinson: Falling graduation rates and 
a widening academic achievement gap.  The rate at which students entering 9th 
grade graduate from High School dropped from over 50% to 46% with Johnson at 
the helm. 

The district's claims of progress in "closing the gap" and boosting student 
achievement are fraudulent. The district is cooking its data. The district is 
measuring the progress of "continuously enrolled" students. In year-to-year 
comparisons of districtwide test scores, the scores of newcomers are NOT added in 
and the scores of the dropouts / pushouts that are included one year are 
dropped the following year. I first noted this method of cooking the books in 
comments about a report at a November 1998 school board meeting and the 1998 
better schools report card (dated Jan. 1999)

Remember, the board predicted that its recently introduced attendance policy 
would contribute to falling graduation rates and falling enrollment (which 
would contribute to its financial troubles). The board was right. Predictably, a 
large majority of the students pushed out of school with this policy happen to 
be students who get low scores on the standardized academic aptitude (NALT) 
and curriculum content (Basic Standards) tests.  That helps to raise the test 
score averages and "close the gap" on paper because the district is making year 
to year comparisons of different sets of students as described above. 

We need a superintendent search process that includes hearings for public 
input and open board meetings without hidden agendas. Above all, the process 
needs to focus on what the district needs to do in order to close the gap, and how 
that's going to be done before serious consideration is given to who should 
lead the district.  

-Doug Mann, King Field
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to