Thanks to Ann DeGroot from Outfront Minnesota for the tip. Now that they no longer have the sodomy law to defend in the state legislature, they seem to need something else to do.

What's interesting is you would think no Minneapolis pol worth his or her salt would be afraid of the Minnesota Family Council - or pay any attention to their bigoted nonsense. After all, how much of the email they generate about things like the recent repeal of the bathroom ordinance even comes from Minneapolis?

Anyway, from this, it looks like they are looking for plaintiffs to try to sue the Minneapolis "deep pocket".

Now I've got a question - would a business have standing to sue if they weren't currently doing business with the city of Minneapolis? How are there any damages if the business has never done business with the city in the past?

The suit I'd really like to see? Single employees suing on the basis of inequitable compensation. To me that's the real inequity going on.

Eva Young
Near North



Dear Friend:

Can you help us? The city of Minneapolis has implemented a pro-homosexual marriage benefits ordinance that will negatively impact many businesses that provide goods and services to the city.

Effective January 1st many companies contracting with the city of Minneapolis to provide more than $100,000 in goods or services will be required to offer their private employees who have domestic partners the same benefits they provide employees who are married. Make no mistake about it. This ordinance is part of an effort to force private employers to promote the homosexual lifestyle.

Not only will this ordinance force many business owners to support behaviors they might oppose on moral or economic grounds, but we strongly believe this ordinance is illegal and will not stand up in a court challenge.

Here's how friends of MFC can help:

Are you or do you know a business owner who does or could potentially provide to the city of Minneapolis any of the goods or services listed below? (Possible candidates would include businesses that contract with other units of government to provide goods or services.) We would like to partner with you and/or other business owners to challenge the legality of this Minneapolis ordinance.

For more information or to see how you can help, contact MFC president Tom Prichard at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or 612-789-8811, ext. 207

List of services/materials City of Minneapolis purchase on contract:

Accountants/Auditors
Architecture
Asbestos/Demolition
Audio/Video
Auditors
Auto Supply
Automobiles/heavy equipment
Banking Services
Cellular Phones
Electrical
Equipment Rental
Excavation
Facility Improvement
Fencing
Fire Prevention
Flooring
Fuels
Furniture
Golf Course material
Grounds keeping
HazMat Contractors
HDR Engineering
Heath Care
Human Services
HVAC
Hydraulics/Pumps
Information Technology/ITS
Insurance
Interior Design/Finishing Construction
Landscaping
Legal Services
Liquid Chlorine/Ferric Chloride
Masonry/Sidewalks
Mental Health/Counseling
Office Supplies
Paper Products/Office Supplies
Park Construction/Maintenance
Parking Ticket
Playground Equipment
Plumbing
Reflective Materials
Road Construction
Roofing
Snow Plow
Social Services
Telecom
Telephone
Traffic Control Devices
Tree work
Waste/Rubbish
Water Utilities
Wetland Establishment
Wood recycling

Eva Young Near North Minneapolis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog is up: http://lloydletta.blogspot.com


REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.


For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to