Wizard Marks noted in her post the potential motion to
dismiss Smith Parker as the coordinator of the Lake
Street process.  From what I've heard from people at
the meeting, PAC chair Paula Gilbertson wouldn't
accept that on the agenda apparently because the
meeting would go beyond the agenda time if it were
added.  I checked the STRIDE website, and the motion
is there, here is the link for those who are
interested:
http://www.stride-mn.org/about-smithparker/motion_to_dismiss.pdf

The motion makes some good points.  Wizard claimed
that the motion was an indication that Ken Avidor was
only at the meeting to "clown", but I disagree.  I
think several points in the motion, such as lack of
competitive bidding, really need to be investigated. 
Wizard made her assertion based on the fact that PAC
didn't hire Smith Parker, the county did; well, that
is true, but PAC stands for Public Advisory Committee,
and their job is to make recommendations about the
process and the project, so moving to dismiss the
coordinators isn't as out of bounds as it may seem.

What is Smith Parker afraid of?

David Piehl
Central

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to