In a message dated 11/24/2003 1:42:39 PM Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [Referring to the position of the board and superintendent 
Jennings]

>    This position is contrary to the contract which states that
>  "This agreement shall remain in full force and effect for a period
>  commencing on July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2003, and thereafter until
>  a new agreement is reached."  The district has been refusing to pay the
>  pay increases for years of service and education that are called for in
>  the existing contract.  Mr. Jennings and the board may have good reason
>  to want to change the pay plan, but  they need to honor the terms of the
>  existing contract before negotiating a new agreement.
>      The full contract is available at mft59.org.
>  
I suspect that the freeze on step and lane pay is a bargaining ploy designed 
to pressure teachers into accepting the districts "pay for performance" scheme 
(which might not save the district any money in the short run) and 
concessions on base pay and other issues, like tenure (appeal) rights, seniority 
rights, 
job bidding procedures, etc.

And just how broke is the district? 

Why is the district staying the course with a disciplinary policy that was 
expected to produce a significant decline in enrollment, revenue, and teachers 
jobs before it was implemented?  The trade off was supposed to be higher 
attendance rates that were supposed to translate into higher achievement levels. But 
the initial big boost in attendance was not accompanied by a significant rise 
in test scores. The number of students being suspended from school has 
dropped a bit, but less than the drop in the students population, a sign that 
classroom climate is generally getting worse, not better.

I have documented how the district has cooking its data on student 
achievement to show modest to incredibly huge progress in boosting academic 
achievement 
and "closing the learning gap."  The district now says its graduation rate has 
jumped from less than to about 80 per cent. Folks, this is an enron-style 
accounting scam inspired by the federal no child left behind legislation, and 
only slightly more credible than Houston zero-dropout miracle. I suspect that one 
way the district is padding its graduation rates is by not counting students 
with serious academic deficits and behavior problems who are involuntarily 
transferred to from regular schools to "alternative schools." 

In my opinion a large part of the problem is systemic in nature. There a 
teacher assignment policies, instructional grouping / curriculum tracking, and 
other policies that undermine instructional effectiveness.  Huge amounts of money 
have been spent on ineffective remedies, like the hundreds of millions spent 
on grade level reconfigurations at the K-8 schools, while programs that work 
are underfunded e.g., all day kindergarten and arts for academic achievement. 

Dave Jennings and those 7 zombies on the board should stop playing games with 
the teachers and stop trying to make the teachers pay for a financial crisis 
of the board's own making. 

Repeal the attendance policy that is driving down enrollment

Go back to doing things that were boosting student achievement and closing 
the gap in the 1970s and 80s, like following best practices in early elementary 
reading instruction and progressively eliminating curriculum tracks for the 
general student population that are not based on a college bound curriculum and 
individualized assessment and planning.

Open up the superintendent search process.

And fire David Jennings immediately! 

-Doug Mann, King Field
Author of "Flight from Equality: School reform in the US since 1983
http://educationright.tripod.com
-
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to