I accidentally erased Terrel Browns email that asked (paraphrasing
here):
Is PPL doing anything to address desegregation in Minneapolis? 

Why is no one asking that to the non-impacted neighborhoods where there
currently is no affordable housing?  Why is PPL supposed to address
supportive family housing issues as well as fix desegregation in
Minneapolis?  Why is there an assumption that everyone moving into PPL
is a person of color?

As a shelter provider who has tried to site shelter in non-impacted
neighborhoods, we come up against just as much resistance from those
neighborhoods as we do in "impacted neighborhoods."  Are we supposed to
spend years (YEARS!) banging our heads against a wall to try to site one
shelter in Linden Hills when we have community members sleeping outside?
There are people in EVERY SINGLE neighborhood who would be opposed to
affordable/supportive housing or shelters.  I agree that poverty should
NOT be concentrated in the core of the city, but what happens when every
other neighborhood blocks you out as well?   

Allysen Hoberg
Audobon Park 

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Cramer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 11:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Mpls] response from PPL Executive Director

Jim Graham's bitter and abusive post to the Minneapolis Issues List last
week about Project for Pride in Living, Inc. (PPL) demands a response.
Thanks to the List Manager for calling Mr. Graham on his inflamed
rhetoric, but more needs to be said.

I am quite certain a ruling by the Federal District Court thwarting Mr.
Graham's (and Ventura Village's) goal to stop the Collaborative Village
Initiative (CVI) project in mid-stream pushed him over the edge. Even
so, the poisonous language was remarkable even by his standards. There
is no excuse for spewing such venom.

The organization Graham attacked (and not for the first time) has been a
vital force in the Twin Cities for more than three decades. During that
time PPL has completed well over 1300 affordable housing units, both
apartments and homes, located in dozens of Minneapolis and St. Paul
neighborhoods and three inner-ring suburbs. (At this moment there are
neighborhood supported PPL housing projects under construction or
planned in East Phillips, Jordan, Regina, Kingfield, Hawthorne, Summit
University and the East-Side in St. Paul, and the City of New Hope.) We
have directly employed thousands of immingrants, men and women leaving
prison, and economically disadvantaged people - and trained hundreds
more for employers like Abbott Northwestern Hospital and US Bank -
giving these folks a chance to become contributing members of the
community. Our Self-Sufficiency Program provides supports to families,
typically single moms, designed to help them gain greater self-reliance
and leave dependence on public assistance behind. Education programs
like Jeremiah's Porch College House (in Ventura Village) and the
Partnership Academy Charter School we sponsor serve inner-city kids by
providing a quality learning environment and relationships with caring
adults tutor/mentors.

This work over 30 plus years earned PPL designation as one of ten
outstanding community development corporations in America by the Fannie
Mae Foundation. Over the years PPL has worked cooperatively and
creatively with every kind of organization imaginable - community and
neighborhood groups, businesses, civic organizations, government
agencies, other non-profits, colleges and universities ... the list goes
on.

Then there is Ventura Village and Jim Graham. Simply put they have
declared war on PPL, and its time for us to respond. Here is a different
perspective for Minneapolis Issues List readers to consider when they
evaluate the current state of affairs between PPL and the handful of
white homeowners, including Graham, who hold an iron grip on the Ventura
Village organization.

The root cause of tension is PPL's commitment to build Collaborative
Village at Elliot and Franklin. Thanks to the recent court rejection of
a motion to enjoin the project, CVI will be built as a new 20 unit
structure providing affordable family housing. 16 of the units will be
rented to carefully screened families who are experiencing chronic
homelessness. The other 4 will be occupied by families who have advanced
from those circumstances to a position of greater stability, and will
therefore act as role models to others in the building. Graham persists
in characterizing the future tenants of the project as "recovering
addicts". I assume he does not mean the children who will reside there
instead of a shelter or a relative's couch, nor does he mean the future
adult tenants whose disability has nothing to do with drugs. Mr. Graham
must have a powerful crystal ball to know in advance the mix of tenants
before PPL or our partner Pillsbury United Communities (PUC) have
selected among applicants. PUC's role, by the way, is to work with PPL
to provide comprehensive supportive services on site at CVI.
(Ironically, the only way these services designed to help tenants
succeed won't be delivered in this way is if the Ventura Village lawsuit
ultimately prevails, as unlikely as that seems at this point.) 

One more fact about CVI. Funding for the project is being provided -
despite the cloud of the Ventura Village suit - by the City of
Minneapolis, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, Hennepin County, the
Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Federal Home Loan Bank,
the National Equity Fund, Twin Cities United Way, and the Otto Brememr
Foundation. These are not institutions which hold ill will for the
inner-city.

Graham's screed repeats the saw about non-profit organizations
victimizing helpless neighborhood organizations like Ventura Village
because of our money and power. Please. Even a casual observer of
Minneapolis City Hall knows neighborhoods hold considerable sway over
decision making. In fact, CVI must be an especially meritorious project
to overcome the pro neighborhood group bias that often carries the day.
For PPL's part, in virtually every interaction over 30 plus years it has
been possible to find common ground with other interested groups -
including neighborhood organizations - around our mission of helping
low-income people become stronger contributors to the community. In many
cases that commitment to individuals and families has extended to
building up the neighborhoods where they live through commercial
revitalization projects like Mercado Central or transformative housing
initiatives like Portland Place, widely credited with helping lead the
turnaround of property values in Phillips. But when confronted by
implacable, irrational opposition and bullying tactics, I am proud to
say PPL will stand tall. This is particularly true when the opponents
are in no way representative of the interests of low-income families or
newly arived Minnesotans absent from the "official" neighborhood
process.

Predictably Graham attacks Chicago Crossings at Chicago and Franklin as
the cause of drug problems in Ventura Village. The assertion that a
building causes the drug trade so many have combatted so vigorously in
so many ways is simplistic and ignorant of the complex underlying causes
of the crack phenomenon in Urban America. But unlike Mr. Graham, I am
going to give credit where credit is due and say Ventura Village has
worked hard to address drug trade along Franklin Avenue. Their tactics
have frequently been counter productive in my view, but they have tried.
So has PPL. We established the first Phillips police sub-station in
Chicago Crossings. We paid for off-duty cops. We still pay for private
security. We have brought public officials including judges who can make
a difference to the area and urged more effective action. Our staff have
put their personal safety at stake many times. We have also focused on
finding productive options for those who might gravitate towards drugs
as an alternative. The response over several years has been a team
effort involving many groups and individuals from the area. And we have
had success. The problem is not eliminated, but it is dramatically
reduced. Any fair minded person would say so.

There are many other points to be made - about PPL's relationship with
the Somali community (25% of our tenants, a large number of employment
trainees and three full-time staff are Somali, and our relations are
excellent), the motives of our staff (dedication, service, compassion,
selfless are terms that some to mind) ... I could go on and on, but
won't.

Here is the final point. Graham's recent diatribe was in response to an
inquiry from a list member elsewhere in Minneapolis. His precise
language was deeply offensive, but the essence of his message was he
hopes PPL will leave Ventura Village. No chance. Our new Service Center
and Headquarters is under renovation at 11th and Franklin. CVI will be
built. We are almost done with a new single-family home to be sold to a
lower-income buyer at 21st and Elliot. Our building across from Chicago
Crossings will be renovated into an education and employment learning
center as part of our current $10.8 million capital campaign. Most
importantly our programs will continue to serve dozens of Ventural
Village residents and children every year the neighborhood organization
never sees because of their narrow vision of the community.



   




REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see:
http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to