To address some of Jonathan Palmer's questions.

What do those without homes and their advocates want.?

1) Clean, safe and affordable housing

2) Jobs

3) Treatment for medical, mental health, dental and chemical dependency
problems

4) Three square meals

Given that our local, state and federal governments are  unwilling to
guarantee the above for those without homes this is what those without
homes and their advocates are asking for now:

1) That Minneapolis Police stop harassing and physically abusing those
without homes.  (Refer to a Minneapolis Star Tribune editorial published
in February of this year.)

2)  That local anti-camping laws and ordinances be repealed so that those
without homes who are turned away from homeless shelters for lack of beds
are less vulnerable to police brutality.  When people are technically
breaking the law, whether the law is consistently enforced or not, they
are at the mercy of our dubious legal and law enforcement system.

3)  That bridge rods not be installed, so those turned away from homeless
shelters can at least stay halfway dry when it rains or snows, and have
some protection from the wind as well.

4)  That existing shelters be cleaner, safer and better staffed so that
those without homes can be confident that a homeless shelter is
preferable to the streets.

5) That existing shelters stay open 24 hours a day, so that those without
homes are not forced to compound their misery and despair by wandering
the streets from 6 or 7 in the morning until the shelters reopen in the
evenings.

Revenue shortfalls and budget crises?    Nonsense.  When we had
"prosperity", budget surpluses and tax rebates in the late 90s through
the first part of 2001, there were nearly as many underserved homeless
people as we have now.

Face it folks, in an excessively materialistic and militaristic culture,
such as ours, that fosters violence and hyper-individualism, homelessness
is not going to go away.  In Canada and much of Europe homelessness
hardly exists.  But this may change, unfortunately, given the imperatives
of globalization which demand that nations decrease social service
spending and raise their military budgets, just like the good ol' USA,
which has the dubious honor of exporting so many of its social problems.

The homeless problem we have now is not the fault of our current mayor
and city council, but the indifference displayed by them (as well as our
county, state, and national office holders) is rather appalling. 

While it may be up for debate whether or not R.T. Rybak actually supports
government funding for a sports stadium, its perfectly clear that he's
more interested in a new sports stadium for Minneapolis than addressing
issues around homelessness.  This is where I part company with Mark
Snyder.

Of course, Mark is perfectly correct to suggest a sensible advocacy
approach.  No one likes to be put in the hot seat and publicly shamed. 
Political advocacy is like medicine.  You always begin with the least
invasive procedure, and only step up if the disease persists.

Therefore, if office holders ignore polite inquiries through letters,
emails and phone calls, as Mayor Rybak has (I remember him asking
Margaret Hastings and others, on one occasion,  to let up on the emails
to his office), then concerned citizens not only have the right, but the
moral obligation to step up the pressure.

While I was wrong to assume that the counting of shelter beds as
affordable housing was a practice started by the Rybak administration, it
appears that public outcry, as well as a little shaming by others, had
the desirable effect of forcing Rybak's office to change this outrageous
practice.

And Mark, I doubt that any progress in the area of human rights would
have been made had civil rights advocates, feminists, and AIDS advocates
been as nice and sensible as you think Margaret Hastings should
be.-------------------------Peter Schmitz   CARAG




REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to