Hi, Lydia Howell requested I reformat and send her post which she could not 
get on the forum due to the formating issue. 
Margaret Hastings-Mpls  
See her post below:
   
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 11:34:46 -0600
From: Lydia Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Much Homelessness CREATED by Public Policies

I lived in Minneapolis 15 years, have been covering housing/homelessness 
issues for over 4 years and persoanlly KNOW a number of people (most of 
them EMPLOYED) who've been homeless. If our elected 
"representatives"--like the Mayor--are supposed to "serve the public", 
why is it that so many of their positions and policies ONLY serve the 
most economic PRIVILEDGED members of the public? This is not just a 
legitamate question. but, in an alleged "democracy" a CRUCIAL one. What 
I've witnessed first hand is this:
1. Older truly AFFORDABLE housing stock has been SYSTEMATICALLY 
DESTROYED  since the mid-1980s as cost of housing RISES.
2.The vacant lots created are then given to big developers who build 
housing at $200.000 to as much as almost $1million(depending on 
developemnt). Homeless people sure can't besides much of the working 
class NOT afford this housing! Look at the signs in front of such 
developments and you see how many PUBLIC(tax payers' money) go into 
these developments, in effect SUBSIDIZING housing for those WITH 
MONEY--and leaving those WITHOUT money (often literally) in the cold.
3."Demonizing" poor and homeless people has worked very very well as 
DISTRACTION from the UPward/REVERSE"Robin Hood" of giveaways to the 
wealthy & corporations since Reagan years. It's classic scapegoating 
that ought to be seen through by now.
4.Here's a reality-check on homeless folks:40+% are EMPLOYED--they just 
can't FIND houding threy can afford.Reality-check:a ONE-room efficiency 
averages $450 a month--IF you can FIND it;a 1-bd rm is $625 a month. 
Imagaine being a $5.50-6.00 an hour worker trying to pay for such 
hosuing! Do the people who serve you at McDonald's, ring you up at 
Rainbow or Target, take care of your kids or elderly parent DESERVE A 
PLACE TO LIVE? In wartime, we're told to "support the troops": as many 
as HALF the homeless men are vets. What about the folks who are mentally 
itll? Reagan promised community-based programs when closig most stae 
mental hospitals--but, those alternatives never happened! Many of the 
women w/children who are homeless are escapoing deomstic 
violence--shelters for battered women have NEVER had enough beds to meet 
the need & they have ALL been CUT in Pawlenty's budget. HALF the runaway 
girls are escaping sexual abuse at hands of fathers, step-fathers, 
mother's boyfriend--but, for the 800 (that we know of) homeless youth in 
TC, there are LESS THAN 100 beds--that's "family values" for you! When 
we're UNwilling to deal w/these other issues(menatl health, domnestic 
violence, child abuse), that also creates homelessness.
5.WHY are middle-class folks OUTRAGED by putting supportive housing or 
shelters or public low-income housing in their neighborhoods--yet NOT 
outraged by the HUGE giveaways of their taxes to Target($60-100 million 
for their new corp hq/store downtown) or for by the river housing for 
the rich($300,300-900,00EACH condo!). Land, infrastructure, "loans" are 
given to Big Corporations who almost always do NOT KEEP THEIR END OF THE 
BARGAIUN(remember Northwest Airlines getting $350,000 million & the 
good-paying jobs they were going to create? They canceld airplane 
maintenance ctr--relocated to CHINA--& instead creating less than 
10000$8 or $9 an hour reservation jobs!)Never paid back "loan" either. 
WHY aren't folks FURIOUS at the continued "stadium debate"? How can it 
be justified to spend PUBLIC money for this when Carl Pohlad has more 
$$$than he could spend in many lifetimes--meanwhile, schools are cut, 
healthcare cut, parks cut, arts cut--anything for the MAJORITY is cut, 
while the wealthy keep picking the pockets of the rest of us! and 
instead of demanding more "common good" policies, too many folks turn 
their anger on the poor and homeless.

The work that Margaret Hastings continues to do is not only morally 
RIGHT, it's the BEST of what REAL democracy looks like. The most basic 
decency (in even  middle class folks) OUGHT to mean supporting the 
solutions that exist to end homelessness. As Hastings observes:even in 
"the boom times", Sayles-Belton RTEFUSED toaddress the issue & in fact, 
did the policies I've already pointed out that CREATED MORE HOMELESSNESS.
Lydia Howell, Seward
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to