The biggest difference between, say, a Walmart that hires 300 people at $7.50/hour with no benefits and 30 little dollar stores that each hire 10 people at the same $7.50/hour wage is that the 30 little dollar stores are building equity and hopefully some profits for 30 little proprietors, most of them local to the city, if not the neighborhood; the profit & value of the Walmart store get skimmed off to the Walton kids & other (mostly nonlocal) stockholders. It's not a lot of difference for the worker - sometimes working for a chain can be better, especially if you just pick up a retail job off and on. Though at least when there are 30 little dollar stores, you have a choice of quitting your job and finding another equivalent job if you don't get along with your boss or are under a discriminatory boss, or one that tries to force you to work unpaid overtime.
I think a basic requirement for *any* non-locally-owned business should be a living wage - otherwise we're just paying them, indirectly, for the right to have them in our neighborhoods. Walmart definitely fails that test. I don't know about the McDonalds-owned chains. Starbucks is supposed to have really good benefits for their employees.
Jennifer Pedersen, Powderhorn
_________________________________________________________________
Say �good-bye� to spam, viruses and pop-ups with MSN Premium -- free trial offer! http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200359ave/direct/01/
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
