Steve Cross notes:

> On the chance that it will sound like I'm just being a scold, I would
> suggest to everyone in the city that the next eight months are going to be
> very important for the city's schools.  If you adopted an "I'm not
affected"
> stance before, I'd suggest that you drop it and burn with a little fire,
> because everyone is going to be affected.  We need broad participation in
> the mayor's initiative and in the school board's considerations in the
> coming months.  You WILL be affected next time and local protests of "it's
> not fair" won't carry the day next time.

Here's one thing I'm not sure has been discussed: we ARE all affected by the
School Board's postponement of their decision.

Like anything in politics, a highly motivated minority worked hard over the
past 3 weeks and carried the day. This is not to suggest those advocating
postponement were wrong - on process or substance. But it is possible they
distorted the decision against the greater good. 

We've spent a lot of time - rightly - discussing the costs of the closing
plan, but far less time discussing the costs of postponement.

All city schools will have to pitch in to suck up the $2.8 million that
would have been saved by the school closings -- maybe that's inflated, but
$1 million or $2 million, it's still real money and it will come out of
classrooms, at least some of it.

Plus, a postponed school-closing plan now ripples uncertainty through the
entire system (and is arguably magnified). Parents of kindergarteners
entering Kenny, Pratt, Powderhorn, etc. - locked in by school choice cards
filled out before this all happened - will go there for at least one year.
But realistically, they are in some sort of educational purgatory: instead
of knowing where their kids will go the following year, or being reasonably
sure they won't have to switch schools - they are PROBABLY in a school that
will be closed or moved.

As Joe Ericksen notes - rightly - perhaps we should think of programs, not
schools. But even then, there's no certainty your program will exist in an
unknown merger or move.

I wonder how many new Minneapolis parents will scramble to get into other
schools or on waiting lists so their kids could go to the same school start
to finish. But even then - unless your kid is in a new building such as
Burroughs or an untouchable, successful school such as Lake Harriet or
Barton - you can't be 100 percent certain the "safety" school will be open.

I've spoken to some Kenny parents who argue - rightly - that merging their
school with Armatage will cause some Kenny parents to flee to private
schools. But I wonder if that's more or fewer than will flee over TWO years
of uncertainty.

I bring up these points only to air and discuss. I admit, my gut reaction
was "oh, those spineless School Board invertebrates - first Jennings, now
this...you get paid to make a decision!" I admit my kid's school wasn't
slated to be closed (and won't be next time). And I acknowledge over six
months, a better plan could be worked out and generate more community
support.

Then again, it might not. 

We are in this together, so I hope we can weigh all the effects, not just
the most direct ones.

David Brauer
Kingfield

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to