> EY: I also brought Stanek up to many democratic Senators - including Scott > Dibble last year during Pride. What outraged me is the Democrats - led by > Matt Entenza made a huge deal over Lindner's words - while turning a blind > idea to Stanek. snip > Hopefully Minneapolis doesn't have to take him back. This does put McManus > in the hot seat. > > > Eva Young > Near North > Once again, Ms. Young finds it necessary to skewer Democrats who had nothing to do with Stanek's appointment or his confirmation even as she attempts to take credit for raising the issue of Stanek's remarks above.
Most of Driscolls post on this issue deals with State issues - but does also involve attacks on me. I posted a response on the MN Politics Discuss list.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mn-politics-discuss/message/16037
All I can say is that I hear about it from other Republicans when I post items that are critical of the fringe elements in the Republican Party on these lists - and I hear about it from Andy Driscoll when I post things that criticize democrats.
Driscoll: >Richard Stanek no more deserves to be a police officer again in Minneapolis than he is to be Commissioner of Public Safety.
EY: Well it looks like Minneapolis has no choice in that matter. Thanks to Terrell Brown for sending the information about the city council action in this matter to the list.
Eva Young Near North Minneapolis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog is up: http://lloydletta.blogspot.com
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
