MPRB likely had to file as intervener in the FERC docket by a date certain
in order to establish legal standing as the project progresses before FERC.
No sinister plot.

Michael Hohmann
Linden Hills

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Chris Johnson
> Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 4:35 PM
> To: Mpls Forum
> Subject: [Mpls] Crown Hydro bullies Park Board?
>
>
> I've been reading through the numerous filings in the electronic library
> provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission regarding the Crown
> Hydro project (FERC, http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/docket_search.asp,
> search for docket P-11175). This has been highly interesting, downright
> astonishing and depressing all at the same time.
>
> I was initially undecided about this project. I am in favor of
> distributed energy generation and renewable power sources. But I had
> some qualms. As I learned more, I began to become more opposed to this
> project. I finally decided I was completely opposed, but my reasons were
> all related to risk/benefit analysis -- that is, I did not think the
> benefits of this project were worth the risks and impact to the St.
> Anthony Fall's neighborhood and environment.
>
> I always believed that Crown Hydro was an honest, straight-ahead
> business who were simply pursuing their goal of building a successful
> and profitable business for themselves. I have no objection to such an
> effort; I am a capitalist myself.
>
> The Minneapolis Park Board commissioners are supposed to vote this
> Wednesday evening on whether to lease the Mill Ruins Park land to Crown
> Hydro or not. But all is not right in this world.
>
> I just read a filing at FERC (part which I have included below), which
> casts this whole project in a very different light.  Residents along the
> river only just heard about this project recently in the last few weeks.
> Even Park Board followers such as myself only heard about this project
> for the first time at the end of one of the Park Board's trademark "late
> night" new business meetings a few months ago.
>
> But lo and behold -- the Park Board has been negotiating with Crown
> Hydro for years. In fact, the Park Board took the extraordinary step on
> March 6, 2003 (last year) of filing a Motion to Intervene with FERC,
> strongly stating their OPPOSITION to this project! (the filing below)
>
> What in the blue blazes has changed since this strongly-worded
> opposition statement was made?
>
> Now is the time to take action if you are opposed to this project.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
>
> UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
> FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
>
> Crown Hydro Company Project No. 11175-016
>
> MOTION TO INTERVENE
> and
> COMMENTS
>
> SUBMITTED BY THE
>
> MINNEAPOLIS PARK AND RECREATION BOARD
>
> INTRODUCTION
>
> Pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
> Procedures (18 C.F.R. * 385.214) and the Notice of Application issued on
> January 22, 2003, the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board ("Park
> Board") files this Motion to Intervene and these Comments in this
> proceeding involving the application of Crown Hydro LLC ("Crown") for
> amendment of license for the Crown Mill Project.
>
>
> I. DESCRIPTION OF MOVANT
>
> The Park Board is a municipal body consisting of nine
> independently-elected commissioners in the City of Minneapolis, State of
> Minnesota, and files this Motion to Intervene on its behalf pursuant to
> Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure.
>
> Communications in connection with this matter should be sent to:
>
> Rachel B. Ramadhyani, Project Manager
> Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board
> 200 Grain Exchange, 400 South 4th Street
> Minneapolis, MN 55415-1400
> (612) 661-4814
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> II. GROUNDS FOR INTERVENTION
>
> The Crown Mill Project is located in the historic milling district of
> the City of Minneapolis and will use water from St Anthony Falls ("the
> Falls"). The Falls and the Mississippi River are highly significant
> aspects of the historic and natural environment of the City of
> Minneapolis and the State of Minnesota. The area around the Falls,
> including the site of the Crown Mill Project, is listed on the National
> Register of Historic Places as the St. Anthony Falls Historic District.
> The Park Board has acquired a substantial amount of property within the
> Historic District, including the site of the Crown Mill Project, and is
> in the process of (1) design and construction of "Mill Ruins Park" on
> this site, in cooperation with the United States Government, (2)
> planning improvements to the Great River Road adjacent to the Project
> site, with the intention of providing cultural, recreational, and
> aesthetic benefits to the public, also in cooperation with the United
> States Government, and (3) furthering other plans to preserve the
> historic and natural environment of the Falls as it exists in the City
> of Minneapolis. These activities involve the expenditure of significant
> capital resources on the part of the Park Board, the City of
> Minneapolis, and the United States Government.
>
> At the present time, substantial strides have been made toward the
> implementation of these plans. The first phase of development of Mill
> Ruins Park was completed and opened to the public in October 2001, and
> the next phase of park construction, which also involves improvements to
> the Great River Road, will be undertaken during the upcoming
> construction season of 2003. Both park construction phases have received
> substantial Federal Highway Administration funding, along with funds
> from various State of Minnesota and local sources.
>
> The Crown Mill Project as originally licensed requires the use of
> parkland (portions of Mill Ruins Park) owned by the Park Board to convey
> water from the river to the hydroelectric equipment and to then return
> the spent water to the river. The amendment of license requested by
> Crown would additionally locate the powerhouse and ancillary facilities
> on parkland owned by the Park Board. This parkland was acquired by the
> Park Board for its historic and natural significance and for the purpose
> of developing a system of parkways, trails, and interpretive and
> recreational features intended to provide public access to and
> interpretation and preservation of the significant natural, historic,
> and scenic values of the location. The parkland is protected by the
> National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C.A * 4321 to
> 4370b) and falls within the Mississippi National River and Recreation
> Area (MNRRA) (1988 Public Law 100- 696), the Upper Mississippi reach of
> the federally-d
> esignated American Heritage River (1998), and the National Millennium
> Trail designated by the United States Department of Transportation (1999).
>
> The Park Board, the City of Minneapolis, and the public are therefore
> strongly impacted by the activities of the Crown Mill Project. Any
> change in the conditions of the project license, and, in particular, the
> proposed amendment, will have a significant impact on ability of the
> Park Board and its many partners, including the United States of
> America, to successfully implement the recreational and preservation
> goals discussed above. In addition, significant archaeological resources
> which are contributing features to the St. Anthony Falls Historic
> District will be impacted by the proposed amendment. The Park Board's
> motion to intervene is made in the public interest, in that the Park
> Board is the provider and protector of parks and historic and natural
> sites within the City of Minneapolis.
>
> The interest of the Park Board and the City of Minneapolis will be
> directly affected by the outcome of this proceeding. Based on the
> foregoing, the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board requests that its
> Motion for Intervention be granted.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
>
> The full text of the above Park Board filing at FERC can be read here
> (http://www.mplsparkwatch.org/node/view/69) or here
> (http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/common/OpenNat.asp?fileID=9653710) in
> text format, or you can view images of the original documents at this
> location
> (http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/File_list.asp?document_id=4080706).
>
>
> Chris Johnson
> Fulton
>
> REMINDERS:
> 1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager
> at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
> 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
>
> For state and national discussions see:
> http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
> For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
> ________________________________
>
> Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn
> E-Democracy
> Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
>


REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to