I really don't see how Laura's proposed new drug delivery methods for 
nicotine are relevant to the HVAC system that Michael Atherton proposes, 
although she is right about the latter being expensive. I also don't see "scrubbing" 
mentioned anywhere in Atherton's post, but his proposal for smoking rooms with 
lower air pressure is pretty much how any good HVAC system in a restaurant or 
bar works now, except that they seldom go as far as actually maintaining a 
lower pressure and settle for a uniform inflow of air from nonsmoking areas into 
smoking areas and out, either to the atmosphere or a higher quality filtering 
system than would be found normally. The latter would save some energy, but 
still be kind of stinky (hence my "mythical" smoke-free areas as described in 
an earlier post). To go the extra mile and maintain these rooms at a negative 
pressure to those surrounding them as Atherton proposes would require venting 
directly to the atmosphere or an expensive system to recirculate air while 
maintaining pressure as well as "air locks" to provide free movement from one area 
to anotherâit would be far from fail-safe unless they had the kind of 
redundancy as in hospitals.
    A ban would certainly be less problematic than forcing proprieters to 
install and maintain systems like those above as Mark Snyder pointed out in so 
many words. I still hope that decision makers in St. Paul and Minneapolis will 
provide for some way for businesses to opt out of a ban by hanging a "Beware of 
Smokers" sign or spending a fortune on HVAC in their buildings so that they 
can watch their bottom line continue to shrink due to increased energy costs 
and needless capital costs; I call it a "separate but unequal" doctrine. As I 
argued before, government regulation should only go so far.
   As far as nicotine delivery systems go, I understand that the stuff used 
to be a fairly common insecticide. Perhaps the tobacco companies can provide 
another tincture for that purpose that addicts can carry in a flask with no FDA 
questions asked. I think the gum and patches are FDA approved, aren't they? 
And there's always the old fallbacks of snuff and chewing tobaccy.
Bill Kahn
Prospect Park  
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to