Dyna Sluyter wrote:
The Upper Harbor Terminal has- I think 5 employees- and is a financial drain
on the City.
Because it has been neglected and poorly managed.
Or maybe because it is not economically viable.
Whether it should be closed or not is a much larger question.
Indeed it is- communities all over western Minnesota rely on Port of Minneapolis as an outlet for their crops. We need alliances with those communities at the legislature, and closing the Port will produce such ill will that those outstate legislators will seek revenge against Minneapolis for years to come. BTW, have any of your board members ever followed the river down to the last lock? Or followed the railroads that feed Port of Minneapolis out to the Dakotas? I have, but I'm just a dumb working stiff that needs smart people like your board to decide stuff for me...
The Upper Harbor, and even any part of the City of Minneapolis as a major river shipping port was a completely ludicrous and bankrupt idea which unfortunately did not die before we finally built the silly thing. This had been a pipe dream since the late 1800s.
The city, state and federal tax payers have poured billions of dollars down this rat hole, and we get under-utilized 2-unit barges in return.
The sane and economically reasonable thing to do is send all that cargo a few miles further by rail or truck to St. Paul. The 3 locks upriver from St. Paul are there simply so Minneapolis can say "me too" when it comes to having a river port, rather than for practical reasons.
I'd like to know just how many of those out-state communities Dyna refers to are actually economically dependent to any degree on cargo shipped to Minneapolis and then downriver via the Upper Harbor? If there actually is a significant number of them, then her point is valid -- politics being what it is.
Our transportation infrastructure is a disaster, blown this way and that by special interests and political favors. It ought to be designed (and built) using some sort of organized, rational, larger-view planning including all the stakeholders and market forces, instead of as a series of pork barrel favors for which ever construction company has the best lobbyists.
Regardless of the outcome of any sort of transportation infrastructure utopia, I think the days of the Upper Harbor are pretty much numbered. It just doesn't make sense to try and put that much barge traffic down the river gorge unless we want to spend billions to turn it into a uniformly wide and deep canal with gentle bends that large barges can navigate. How many want that? Let's see a show of hands.
Chris Johnson / Fulton
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
