Sorry to be obscure, Gregory. I'm speculating that because the Minneapolis delegation didn't vote the Governor's way on any number of things (Yecke, bonding specifics, ed standards, etc.), he might have vetoed a project that would help the city.
After all, there's probably a special session coming and the governor just created another chit to gain Minneapolis votes. As I said, pure speculation. David Brauer Kingfield -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregory Luce Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 4:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Mpls] Pawlenty vetoes Mpls project I've been meaning to ask, despite likely showing how I may be politically well out of the loop, but just what is it payback for? I ask genuinely, as I'm scratching my head and waiting for one of those less and less frequent "Ahaah" moments. Gregory Luce St. Paul The List Manager wrote: Subject: [Mpls] Pawlenty vetoes Mpls project Would allow a transit/housing development to have a single bidder. Payback? REMINDERS: 1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
