Not that Mann's question is irrelevant ("What capabilities have the 
finalists demonstrated that make them the best of 
a very large pool of candidates for the job of school district 
superintendent, 
in the opinion of the board members?"), but although I am unable to find the 
RFP on the MPS web site for hiring a search firm for the hiring process 
(unless it is the same one for the "community engagement process" released early 
last month; this RFP outlines some of the search criteria for the Supt. position 
and you'll find a link below to a page with a summary and link to the RFP; 
there is no real transparency in MPS in this area so far as I can see), I think 
that qualifications probably have little to do with choosing these three 
particular people. It very well might be based on a willingness to leave the 
quagmire they are in presently, excepting the former Seattle Supt. who is now a 
consultant and already done so, and coming to take responsibility for our own 
(you'd be hard pressed to find many districts without trouble in any part of the 
country, I think). All I can find on the search process is the last link below 
and it essentially points to criteria from citizen input (more than 600) 
gathered in January rather than the "engagement process" initiated in May following 
the aborted implementation of the school and program closing plan.  
    I'm surprised they found any as good as these three, but it seems that 
(leaving the race and spin issues raised by Michael Atherton alone) the choice 
is between people who are primarily oriented in the administration of education 
and one with less such experience but more in business and government, a 
David Jennings type if you will. It begs the question of whether it might have 
been better to stick with the archetype Jennings in the first place with an 
assistant well versed in education administration.
    The broader question for me is why any people in Minneapolis believe that 
a change in leadership here is somehow going to change a situation 
perpetuated by lowered enrollment and funding cuts caused by the policy shifts at the 
state and federal level of government. All I can find on the search process is 
the last link below. What we really need are coherent strategies articulated by 
the MPS board within the realm of economic reality and a capable 
superintendent to implement them. As far as the board, I only have confidence in three 
of 
them, one of whom is leaving and another being challenged in this round of 
elections and I cannot say I have any confidence in any of the present 
challengers. It sure looks like we're up the creek without a paddle to me (maybe even 
without paddlers).

Bill Kahn
Prospect Park

<A HREF="http://www.mpls.k12.mn.us/Superintendent_Search#summary";>
http://www.mpls.k12.mn.us/Superintendent_Search#summary</A> 
   
<A HREF="http://www.mpls.k12.mn.us/Community_Engagement_Process";>
http://www.mpls.k12.mn.us/Community_Engagement_Process</A>
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to