Connie Nompelis wrote:

On the subject of the "Gramma" who rented the
apartment and then allowed gangster-types in:

Why is illegal activity on the premises grounds for
eviction?  How does "Gramma" avoid and/or contest
eviction when the terms of the lease have been broken?
 (So long as the lease bans illegal activity)

[Gregory D. Luce]:

Sheesh.  Complicated and big question, you betcha.

Gramma avoids or contests the eviction by putting the landlord to his or
her proof.  If the proof is not in the pudding (i.e., by a preponderance
of the evidence), then she stays unless she also owes rent and cannot
pay that rent.

Sophisticated tenants know and understand this (as do even
unsophisticated lawyers) and it's sufficient leverage in many ways to
avoid an all out trial on the issue of a breach of the lease or a breach
of the statutory covenants.  In many cases the fact that there was a
drug raid and contraband was found is sufficient for the tenant to know
that they will ultimately lose--thus there is typically a settlement
that the tenant will move within a certain amount of time.

Much more complicated (for the landlord) are the cases where there was a
raid but nothing was found.  Moving up the complication scale is proving
that Gramma--the only person on the lease-- knew or should have known
about the illegal activity.  Little ol' Gramma may have been knitting in
the back room while it all went down. Also complicating things for
landlords: getting the cooperation of the police and even neighbors in
going to court to testify about the illegal activity.  So, if I put the
landlord to his/her proof on the evidence, it gets costly pretty quickly
for the landlord to put together a solid case.  Same goes, in many ways,
for tenants putting together a good defense.  And believe me, I've seen
many a case that looked solid at first for the landlord but fell apart
quickly when the proof just wasn't there.

You do not need a lease to evict a tenant for certain illegal
activities, namely drug-related activities, prostitution, unlawful
possession of firearms, and receipt of stolen property.  These are the
statutory covenants which the landlord and a tenant agree not to allow
criminal activity on the premises.  In most other cases, you need a
lease that sets forth what constitutes a breach before you can evict a
tenant for that breach.

One caveat before I put away the cheat sheets:  the general notion that
the landlord must show that Gramma knew or should have known about the
illegal activity--and thus should be evicted-- is a complicated one that
generally (big emphasis on generally) differs between private market
housing and federally subsidized housing.  A federal crackdown on
criminal activity in public housing in the late 1980's resulted in new
regulations that stated a tenant in public housing could be evicted if
the tenant, a member of the tenant's household, or even a guest engaged
in drug-related criminal activity on or near the premises.  Courts have
since held that even if Gramma did not know of the drug-related criminal
activity she could still be evicted.  The seminal case in Minnesota is
the MPHA vs. Mai Lor case, which is online at:

http://www.lawlibrary.state.mn.us/archive/supct/9904/c2971756.htm

So, ask a complicated question, get a long-winded complicated answer
that in many cases comes down to a lawyer's favorite word:  depends.

Gregory Luce
St. Paul
www.project504.org


 


                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see:
http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to