In a message dated 6/20/2004 8:59:23 AM Central Daylight Time, Andy  Driscoll 
writes:
>>Of course, every agency and research  institution in the world affirms not 
only
the dangerous effects of  second-hand smoke, but new evidence shows that
short-term exposure to  relatively small amounts of smoke is highly toxic to
human health. You may  start with the National Institutes of Health, the
University of Minnesota and  the World Health Organizations of the UN, then
add the American Cancer  Society, Heart Association and the American Lung
Association plus every  pulmonary and oncology organization in the world.

If you believe you have  evidence refuting 60 years of increasingly solid
research affirming the  dangers of second-hand smoke - produce it.<<
 
Actually Andy, that's not the way the process works. You are the one who  
wants to ban an otherwise legal activity; thus it's up to you to provide the  
evidence which supports your proposal. 
 
 
There's one little problem: you won't be able to.
 
All of the organizations you mentioned base their arguements on the 1998  WHO 
report and the 1993 EPA report. In the case of the former, the report admits  
it finds at very best a weak and statistically insignificant link. With the 
EPA  report, a federal judge found that the agency had ignored contrary data to 
 produce a report which agreed with the agency's political motivations. In 
other  words, they cheated.
 
So, if you have good information, produce it. Otherwise, you're free to  rant 
any way you like. But don't act as if the weight of scientific evidence is  
behind you, because it isn't.
 
M. G. Stinnett
Jordan
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to