I resent the implications below that I was somehow perpetuating a 
Reaganesque stereotype. It is my understanding from reading my newspaper, that 
Section 8 housing is in short supply relative to the need; one of the reasons for 
this is fear, justified or not, of property owners that filling this need is 
going to lead to losses of one kind or another. I don't know the Section 8 law, 
but I suspect that cohousing could fit the requirements and help solve this 
shortage problem what ever number of certificates needed over the 5000-6000 
supplied by MPHA sited below. Again, I feel that the authors below are attempting 
to stereotype me.
   I am thankful to Gary Hoover who responded to the point of what I wrote, 
that cohousing or cooperative housing can serve a role in public housing policy 
to address all sorts of society's problems. As to the others, ;-) this 
bigoted misanthrope would throw them out of their digs if he could. Be afraid, be 
very afraid;-) 

Bill Kahn
Prospect Park
*******************************************
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 21:03:36 -0500
From: "Gregory Luce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [Mpls] Need a Smoke-ban Break? Let's talk housing
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="us-ascii"

Bill Kahn wrote:

I've often thought that instead of the status quo hodgepodge of federal,
state, and local housing policies resulting in the inadequate system we
have now, e.g., Barb Lickness's Section 8 neighbor who hosts gang
bangers and druggies, what we really need is a mix of housing types
metrowide that actually lifts a culture of poverty into the mainstream,
for better or worse.

[Me]:

I agree Bill Kahn's general point to suggest the need for a mix of
housing types.  But just want to cut to the quick on some unfortunate
stereotypes that he suggests.  The overwhelming experience with Section
8 (now called the Housing Choice Voucher Program) is positive. Section 8
is not synonymous with 'gang bangers and druggies,' nor should Barb's
experience be seen as an example of the 'inadequacy' of the federal
Section 8 housing system.  A misperception, yes, but it's a
misperception just as damaging and demeaning as assuming that most
people in Minnesota who receive welfare are black (they're not).

Bill Kahn again:

Section 8 housing in certain parts of our cities is not a great deal 
better as Lickness's experience attests.

[Me]:

The Minneapolis Public Housing Agency (MPHA) administers some 5,000 or
so Section 8 Vouchers city-wide (though it may be 6,000 or so, my brain
and the MPHA site are both fritzing at the moment).  The vast majority
of the tenants who benefit from the vouchers are lease and law-abiding,
just as the vast majority of tenants generally are lease and
law-abiding.  There are always bad eggs, just as there are bad eggs in
every situation, organization, municipality, and neighborhood.

All this said (and said as more of a check on misperceptions than as a
suggested direction of the discussion), I'm a fan of co-housing myself
and would like to see more opportunities for it in the city.

Gregory Luce
St. Paul
Message: 6
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 20:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Barbara Lickness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [Mpls] Need a Smoke-ban Break? Let's talk housing
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I am absolutely in line with Greg Luce on this one.
The craziness and evil behavior going on in the house
across the street from me is not a reflection of
section 8, public housing or low income people. It is
a reflection on one family. A family that is
completely "out of control". A family that as Victoria
Heller put it was able to slip through all the tenant
screening mechanisms built to prevent problem tenants
from renting the place. 

I have 6 2 1/2 story walk-ups on my block as well as
several duplexes. I am sure some of the tenants are
using section 8 certificates to rent. One of the
buildings is an affordable housing cooperative. All of
the tenants in these buildings are fine neighbors. 

Public Housing has made extensive attempts to locate
families into their housing portfolios that exist all
over town. There is even some in affluent
neighborhoods. Quite frankly in most cases you
wouldn't know the difference between a scattered site
house and a regular house. The families in these
houses blend into neighborhoods just like anyone else
living there. 

Unfortunately, when we get one "out of control" family
people want to start condemning the whole system. The
system works just fine. It does not need fixing. The
"out of control" family needs fixing. It does not
appear to me right now that they want to be fixed.

I have heard people say on this forum and the Whittier
forum that we need to support this "out of control"
family, nurture them and help lift them from their
problems.  Give me a break! You are assuming they want
to be lifted from their evil plight. I am here to tell
you that there are mediation services, treatment
programs, social programs and tons of other
intervention processes in place to help people and
families who want to change. The problem is you have
to want to change. You can't make somebody do
something they don't want to do. Like any behavior
change it must begin from within. Ask any recovering
alcoholic or drug addict. Right now it appears to me
that this family is more driven by the perception of
material wealth gained from drug dealing and selling
guns than they are in finding a way to live a
productive contributing life, "gramma" included. 

Don't condemn section 8 and public housing because a
few people on these programs screw up. Both of them
are working just fine for the most part. 

Barb Lickness
Whittier

=====
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change 
the world.  Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has." -- Margaret Mead
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to