The statement, " The job of balancing the budget would have been almost $3 million 
easier had the board voted last winter to close and reorganize schools as Jennings 
proposed" appears in Steve Brandt's piece this morning without attribution. 
http://www.startribune.com/stories/1592/4851527.html
 That's according to whose analysis of what set of data?  It is a speculative 
prediction at best and has a whiny, sour grapes tone.  The idea that closing schools 
saves money makes sense to some people if their school isn't closing.  The district 
will not save money simply by closing schools if the closings drive even more people 
to private and charter schools and if the reorganization is done without a solid plan 
that takes into account the many hidden costs associated with moving large numbers of 
staff and shuffling the children of a large percentage of the city.  If the $3 million 
savings prediction is anything like the estimated number of empty classrooms, well, we 
still don't know how many empty classrooms there were or are in city schools, so it's 
hard to say just how accurate any of the numbers might be.

    The citizens committee that advises the board on budget matters and is "expected 
to remind the board pointedly today that closing schools is overdue" is relying on 
what set of data, what long range plan?  I thought there was going to be some 
extensive public discussions before any more drastic solutions were tried.

    The real savings happen by laying off teachers; closing schools reduces capacity 
and lessens options and saves a little money.  Closing some schools will likely be 
necessary, especially if enrollments continue to drop.  But let's first get a plan in 
place that makes sense to the majority, so that even more families don't leave the 
district because of a short sighted budget 'fix' that leaves them feeling like 
unwanted step children.

And, Bill Kahn, I don't think you need to apologize to the list for keeping Pratt's 
situation up for discussion.  I would rather that  it were one of many associated 
threads that included Kenny's, Hiawatha's, Northrop's, Howe's, etc. plight.

Dan McGuire
Ericsson, which was only slated to be renamed and reorganized
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to