Michael Atherton asks how the Strib can conclude Minneapolis' performance is
"...typical and in some cases better" when the paper's own numbers showed:

>                               Minneapolis     Atlanta
> Number of Students            48,155          56,586
> Poverty                       67%             80%
> Pupil/teacher ratio           14.7            14.7
> Per pupil spending            $10,348 $8,623
> Dropout rate                  14.4            7.6
> Test passing rate             55/47           66/44
> (reading/math)

IMHO, Michael picked the least favorable comparison among the six cities
cited. If I cherry-picked, I could produce this: 
                                
                                Minneapolis     Buffalo
> Number of Students            48,155          45,721
> Poverty                       67%             74%
> Pupil/teacher ratio           14.7            13.2
> Per pupil spending            $10,348 $11,067
> Dropout rate                  14.4            Not available
> Test passing rate             55/47           22/31
> (reading/math)

So Michael is using the most negative example to make a general point. Not
fair. The Strib did say "in some cases."

BUT WAIT! I usually disagree with Michael on this forum, but I AGREE with
him on the more important point here.

I, too, looked at the Atlanta stats and thought "why didn't some editorial
page editor tell whoever made the chart: 'who cares about Buffalo? We know
we're better than some other big cities - so what? These Atlanta numbers
SEEM to show you CAN do more with less. Solutions are more important, so
let's find out if Atlanta really is getting better results for fewer dollars
- and if so, how."

Then I would've spiked the chart - for as Michael astutely notes, the test
passing rate comparison is essentially bogus. States can define their own
passing level (the Strib acknowledges this in a footnote), and one of No
Child Left Behind's flaws is that several have "defined success downward" so
more schools and kids will "pass."

Michael asked how this junk got in the newspaper. Speaking from  experience,
editorialists sometimes get carried away making their case. That's why
[insert higher power here] made editors. They didn't do their job in this
case.

To be fair to the Strib, the chart at least makes me curious about Atlanta.
So....anyone from Atlanta care to comment on whether we should take any
lessons that city?

David Brauer
Kingfield

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to