No, the reduced cost comes from the fact that they are smaller vehicles and weigh much less.

That means that the supports holding up the track can be much smaller & cheaper than those needed to hold up a train of several railcars full of people. Think of the pictures you've seen of a monorail, with the small supporting columns for a long stretch of track.

Tim Bonham, Ward 12, Standish-Ericsson

Why does it cost less than an elevated train?  My guess would be that
it's because the rolling stock is privately owned.  That makes it
_more_ expensive overall because it's cheaper to build vehicles that
hold many people than vehicles that only hold a few.
   -Dave



REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.


For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to