Constance Nompelis wrote:
That's why they'veI question why anyone would endorse or vote for a former incumbent who apparently did not have the sticktoitiveness to re-up when she was still in office (Miller). I get the picture of a dilettante who plays at public office, not a committed individual.
endorsed a current incumbent, a former incumbent, and
a long-time district administrator.
Also, from all the discussion around schools, I get a clear picture that there is a big disconnect between board members, teachers, parents, and students. The superintendent speaks to the board, and they to her. Teachers, parents, and students float in a powerless sea between the two. It makes no sense to me.
BTW: I think Strib editorials are done by committee, which might explain a lot.
WizardMarks, Central ________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
