First let me say I'm not picking on Wizard. I just think her view of
this subject is obviously one seen from only one side, the side behind
the wheel of an automobile. I've been on both sides of (and halfway
through) the windshield.

Wizard Marks wrote:
> I've always taken the position that to hit anyone or anything while
> driving one's bike/car/truck/bus is the BIG mistake. Thus driving is
a
> cooperative experience. To do that, one has to have a certain regard
> for the laws.

MN: Too many people in cars and on bikes have no regard for any laws
including the laws of physics, and have no intention of cooperating
with anyone.

WM:
>Bicycles, in my often aghast observation, seldom stop for red
> lights and stop signs, ride on the sidewalks, will ride against the
> traffic, and, even with bike lanes clearly marked, will insist on
riding
> on the other side of the street where no bike lane is marked or
> expected. They have no headlights or tail lights, nor do they  wear
> reflective clothing uniformly.

MN: Stopping for a red light or stop sign could get you killed in my
neighborhood, or if you're lucky, just beaten and robbed. So could
having any kind of lights on. I've taken enough and seen enough abuse
to know this is a fact.
I don't ride around here much anymore for those reasons. When I do
ride, I have always felt that if I get hit by a car, there's about a
95% probability that it's going to be my fault unless they were trying
to run me down. You have to ride defensively, as well as aggressively
in the city. Sometimes you have to ride the sidewalk to keep from
getting squashed. I stay out of most bike lanes. They are on the left
side of the street, which is not the side motorists are used to seeing
bikes on. That strip of paint is ignored at best, viewed as a personal
affront at worst, by many motorists. It's also used as a parking
lane. When the lines were painted downtown, I rode every block of
every bike lane to see for myself what they were like. Then I went to
the police traffic division and asked if I was bound by law to ride in
the bike lane if I was on a street where one was painted. They told me
they preferred that people use them, but the law doesn't require it.
I absolutely will not use the bike lane on Hennepin. It is a
nightmare.
Don't even get me started about bullying by bus drivers.
Rush hour downtown really is a rush on a bike!

WM:
> I've been bent out of shape on many occasions because there is no
> accepted protocol at corners where autos will be turning, bicycles
could
> be turning (arm signals are not often practiced to, at minimal, give
the
> driver behind a clue about something happening), and cars are parked
> right up to the edge of the sidewalk.

MN:
I believe there is an accepted protocol. It's in the state drivers
manual.
Cyclists are bound by most of the same laws as motorists.
If I get caught riding without lights after dark, I should get a
ticket. Same
goes for failure to yield, signal, etc.
If I'm at a corner waiting for a cyclist to do something and he
doesn't signal,
I'm going to proceed if I have the right of way. Sometimes they will
complain,
but I nip that in the bud by offering them a copy of the state drivers
manual.I
think it might be a good idea to require every vehicle on the road to
have a
copy in the glovebox, or in the bike pack.

WM:
> In my estimation, bicycle traffic is so erratic in behavior that
> it's the devils own time trying to figure out what a bicycler is up
to.
> So,I don't think that putting the onus on the police is going to be
> entirely successful. Put some onus on the bicyclers as well. Get the
> state to pamphletize the metro area on a set of protocols. The whole
> situation is very, very iffy.

MN:One could say exactly the same thing about auto traffic being
erratic, and yes, there should be some personal responsibility on the
part of bikers as well as motorists. I realize personal responsibility
is a foreign concept to some,and dirty words to others.That's where a
hefty fine helps speed up the learning process.
I don't believe another pamphlet is the solution.
Uniform enforcement of existing laws seems to be a better way to get
peoples attention. Lots of bike shops have had information on traffic
laws readily available for a long time. Too bad gas atations don't
keep stacks of drivers manuals on hand. The information is out there,
but If people choose to ignore it,nobody's gonna stop 'em.

Mike Nelson
Central


REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to