Mark Anderson wrote, "But what I would much rather see in Minneapolis 
is cumulative voting (CV) for at-large positions (and make the council seats 
all at-large).  (Is CV the same as PR?)  With CV, minorities in the city could 
get a voice in government."

        [BRM] Cumulative voting and proportional representation are not the 
same thing. Cumulative voting is a system where each voter may cast more than 
one vote for the same candidate. Cumulative voting helps a minority elect at 
least one representative.

        Proportional representation is a somewhat imprecise term because two 
related concepts are often (and not incorrectly) interchanged under the rubric 
"proportional representation": (1) An electoral system that allocates 
legislative seats to each political group in proportion to its voting strength. 
(2) A system of transferable preferential voting in a multi-representative 
election. Sense 1 involves proportionate outcome, having members of a group 
elected in proportion to their numbers in the electorate. Sense 2, more 
precisely termed "proportional voting," involves proportionate input, and 
describes a system also known as single transferable voting. Proportional 
voting, or single transferable voting, is a system where each will migrate or 
"transfer" away from a candidate whom it will no longer help. Under 
transferable voting, a candidate wins if his or her first-choice votes reach 
the number needed to win, or the "threshold." If no candidate reaches the 
threshold, the least-preferred candidate is dropped, and his or her votes 
transfer to the next-preferred candidate on each ballot. If a candidate reaches 
the threshold with an excess, that excess still transfers -- after being 
discounted by the non-excess fraction needed to reach the threshold -- among 
the surviving candidates. Each transfer preserves each vote as long as at least 
one candidate that the voter ranked survives. The redistribution continues 
until enough candidates reach the threshold, or the number of surviving 
candidates equals the number of representatives still to be elected.

        Instant-runoff voting, the system that is commonly proposed for use in 
Minneapolis, is a system of preferential voting that mimics a runoff election 
using each voter's ranked preferences instead of a second round of voting. 
Instant-runoff voting is technically a special case of proportional voting, 
where the number of representatives being elected is one and the "threshold" is 
a simple majority.

BRM

Brian Melendez
Lowry Hill (Ward 7)

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to