The issue of risk assumption and insurance has only been mentioned in passing. I assume NEC is assuming the risk backed by the federal subsidy. It only takes a handful of bad accidents where the hOur car driver is at fault to run up huge legal and medical bills. Let's hope the daily rate charged is sufficient to cover insurance payouts with the subsidy used as a reserve. Also, let's hope the NEC runs Motor Vehicle Records for driver applicants to eliminate (or charge more) for DWIs, Reckless Diving, Excessive or Multiple Speeding, etc. Some insurance people would also recommend running credit scores on potential drivers but I won't go there. Bill Dooley Kenny REMINDERS: 1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
