phaedrus wrote:

McManus said Thursday night that the newspaper's
apology "should be made to Minneapolis Police
Department officers of color, not to me. Certainly, they are all offended by it. This isn't the 1960s
anymore."



I don't intend to be obtuse, but I don't get this one.

Officer Of Color = OK
Colored Officer = Not OK


WM: "Colored officers" harkens back to the times of Jim Crow as a term of disrespect and appeared in public buildings (i.e. "white drinking fountain," "colored drinking fountain"). To use "colored person" now is to announce oneself as being tied to the days of Jim Crow. Naturally, those offended are going to say as much. It is the same as calling someone a Gypsy (Rom), Frog (French), Kafir (person of color), etc.

WizardMarks, Central
__________________________________


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls



REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.


For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to