I'm sorry, but I'm finding the demise of a bar that exists to provide a smoking 
venue had to grieve.  If it goes out of business, that implies it had very 
little other attractiion to its clientele. That is, they DON'T come there for 
the community or food or even beer.  Once the smoking is taken away,  they find 
no reason to come back.  Which means the law and the  closure possibly not only 
SAVED THEIR LIVES, but it also saved all us premium payers expense in our 
health insurance.  This is cumulative benefit to society that more than 
offisets the loss of the bar operator.  Society would be frozen in place if no 
change could ever occur that caused some individual a loss.  All changes cause 
a loss to someone.  Just the churn of layoffs and rehiring cause inidivudals 
very significant losses. Should we make layoffs illegal?  Should the  people 
who get laid off get to sue for a "taking"?  Heck, no. Business would scream 
bloody murder. Well closing a bar to save lives is the same th
 ing as a
 layoff.  Justifiable if society as a whole gains more than the bar owner 
loses.  If you think layoffs are holy, then don't complain about bars closing.

                
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 All your favorites on one personal page � Try My Yahoo!
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to