I want to come to Rep. Kahn's defense a little bit here.  To the best
of my understanding, what she has said is that the MPRA has this city
over a barrel, and that the city is going to have to offer them
something in exchange for changes in the pension agreement that would
help us get out from under this mountain of debt.  If I understand her
remarks, she is criticizing Mayor Rybak and the city council for not
holding their noses and making the agreement with the MPRA.

Honestly, I have a lot of sympathy both for people being angry that
the MPRA is going to have to be bought out, and for people not wanting
to have to explain to their constituents why they gave yet more money
to MPRA plan participants, so that they profited with bonuses during a
market uptick and also had to be bought out when the plan did badly.

I can see why the Mayor would think that the plan participants might
not be exactly being "team players," but if they have us in a
headlock, there may not be much we can do...

On the other hand, I think we can also understand Rep. Kahn's
position.

I don't think it's entirely fair to say that she wants to take away a
City Council tool just because she disagrees with it.  What she is
saying is that it's a desperate measure to pay pension obligations
with bonds, since that is paying recurring expenses with non-recurring
revenue.  Since this is such a fiscally risky maneuver, she is arguing
not that the city council should be forbidden from doing it, just that
it should be able to do it only with the explicit consent of the
voters.

There have been a lot of hot words about this on all sides.  To the
(perhaps limited) extent that we on the list can help, maybe we can
talk things through with an eye to a compromise solution and provide
citizen cover if the only solution involves doing something
unpalatable.


-- 
Robert P. Goldman
ECCO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to