Ok, now it's time for me to put in my 2 cents worth (and reply to my own post).
Lets look at the pattern - and look for the strings. Auditor Anderson attacked R.T. without legal standing for her acquisitions (she has no authority to conduct legal finding of fact on the question of whether R.T. violated campaign laws or not). But she does appear to be beholden to the Rich Taxpayers League who seem to hate everything related to Minneapolis. Who wants to bet that a freedom of information act request would find emails from the rich taxpayer's league to Anderson's office. I also find it interesting that SOS Kiffmeyer was not the person to address the potential possibility of a campaign finance law violation. Isn't she supposed to watch over election law stuff? Oh wait, didn't Kiffmeyer do the same thing 6 years ago and get away with it... Why yes she did. But now that she works for the rich taxpayer's league we just overlook that, just like we should overlook the slanderous attack she made against the City Pages at the State Fair last year. (Which was also proven to be just another rich taxpayers league attack, conducted by their pawn (SOS Kiffmeyer) in state government.) So as far as I'm concerned Anderson and Kiffmeyer should stay out of Minneapolis politics. Both of their hands are dirty and they don't even deserve the amount of text I have given them. Randall Cutting Seward REMINDERS: 1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[email protected] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
