I have a really wild speculation, I mean a really daring and  challenging  
idea.
There are legitimate disagreements about many Park issues that  have been 
discussed on the list and many choices that involve priorities of how  our 
limited dollars should be spent.
 
Please tell me if you disagree, but I think I can come up with 3 things  that 
everyone on this list would agree should be changed at the Park  Board:
 
Protect the taxpayers from commercial failures on Park Land. As an example: 
"The Fort", the extreme sport complex at Fort Snelling that was a private  
commercial operation that went belly up leaving the Park Board (us taxpayers) 
on 
 the hook for 2.5 Million dollars of unpaid contractor fees.
With the benefit of hindsight, this was a huge legal mistake-  yes?
 
Evaluate and make decisions based on the actual cost. Protect the taxpayers  
from cost overruns. What needs to be changed? The thing that really bothers me 
 is not the fact that there are changes or additions to cost estimates. What  
bothers me is some of the biggest decisions made are being made and  voted on 
because at a specific level of funding these decisions make sense,  but if 
the actual cost were known, different decisions would have been  made. At a 
minimum, at least factor in the usual percentage of cost  overrun to any new 
proposal.
 
Tell us what you are doing and why.
Publish or make available online an itemized annual budget for how our  money 
is being spent and list all the fund balances of Park Board  accounts.
Provide an email address for sending an email to the board.
Provide the same agenda to the public that the board receives.
Publish minutes.
 
 
Do we agree about these changes?
 
Thanks,
 Scott Vreeland   Seward
Candidate for Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board     District 3
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to