I, too, remain very irritated by the mayor's literture and the
"coincidental" nature of it all. I will be doubly irritated if he ignores it
waiting for the storm to blow over, and never addresses it, especially if he
takes an approach of "the people's business is more important."

He owes Minneapolis $42,000. RT, if you're reading this, write out the
check, and earn some public trust points.

Mike Thompson
Southwest Minneapolis

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Mpls] RT: The Assessment


> Given the budget mess he inherited from his predecessor and the huge
funding cuts from the State, I think RT's done a pretty good job and intend
to support the mayor in his reelection.  The last 4 years haven't been
perfect -- I hope we can concentrate on our huge and soon to be bigger
property tax bills.
>
> To be frank, I haven't been too impressed with Commissioner McLaughlin's
campaign.  His work at the County has been steller but his mayoral focus on
Eduation, Crime, Neighhborhoods, and Economic Vitality sound too much like
poll-tested buzzwords.  Let's face it PL could run for mayor in any big city
in the country with that platform.  Also, like a previous poster mentioned,
if you want to do something about Mpls schools, run for school board.
>
> I'm still P.O.'d about RT's newsletter sent on the City's dime.  It was
obviously a campaign piece and should have been treated as such.  Since RT's
campaign as so flush with cash, he should re-imburse the City for it.  Until
he does so I will not be contributing any of my own $$$ to his campaign as I
feel I already have done so by paying for the newsletter with my tax
dollars.
>
> Dean E. Carlson
> East Harriet, Ward 10
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gregory Luce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sunday, January 30, 2005 11:39 pm
> Subject: [Mpls] RT: The Assessment
>
> > Mayor Rybak officially announced his reelection campaign earlier
> > today, and I'm surprised no one on the list has discussed it, or the
race
> > generally.What's the assessment of RT?  Deserve another term, and
> > why or why not?  As I've asked before, I'd like to hear more about the
candidates'
> > vision for the city, if not more so than the nitty gritty of what the
> > candidate has  done or will do.
> >
> > And am I just barking up the wrong tree in wanting some closure
> > from the Mayor and his campaign about the $42K mailing in early
January--i.e.,
> > whether the campaign will reimburse the City?  Last we heard  publicly,
we
> > had this statement from Laura Sether:  "we will make a decision  about
this
> > issue in consultation with our attorneys and other independent
nonpartisanadvisers."
> >
> > What say you team of attorneys and independent nonpartisan advisers?
> >
> > Gregory Luce
> > St. Paul
>
>
> REMINDERS:
> 1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at
http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If you think a member is in violation,
contact the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the
list.
>
> 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
>
> For state and national discussions see:
http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
> For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
> ________________________________
>
> Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn
E-Democracy
> Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
> Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
>
>


REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to