Thanks, David, I'll eventually get it figured out.  CAK

-----Original Message-----
From: List manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 1:59 PM
To: CAROL KUMMER
Subject: Re: Proposed MPRB open time change

Carol - to get this to the whole list, send it to [email protected]

Best,
David

On Feb 3, 2005, at 1:14 PM, CAROL KUMMER wrote:

> Dear List,
>
> The Standards and Conduct committee (committee members are 
> Commissioners Fine & Dziedzic; I am the chair) met yesterday to review

> several Board rules for updating and consistency.� After discussion 
> and tweaking, all but one passed unanimously.� Item 3, the second 
> paragraph which read: �The Board shall also consider moving open time 
> prior to the start of the cable broadcast. �The open time 
> communication is intended for public communication to the Board of 
> Commissioners, not an �open mike� for public input.� � did NOT pass 
> unanimously. ��I spoke against it and voted against it and will not 
> support it and when it comes to the full Board, I will again vote 
> against it.� And I predict it will not pass. �
>
> �
>
> I share your outrage.� While it is uncomfortable to listen to 
> implications and accusations that we are not doing a good job, it is 
> all citizens� right to criticize, comment or compliment their elected 
> officials� actions.� It is part of the �job� and a barometer of public

> opinion that we ought not try to thwart.
>
> �
>
> During my years of public service, I have consistently worked toward 
> openness and public participation. ��When I became a member of the 
> Metropolitan Council, meetings were held at 2 PM � not a good time for

> the working public. Within a very short period, meeting times were 
> moved to 4PM � not my first choice but better. �MPRB�s meeting time of

> 5 PM and 6PM for open time are, I believe, a reasonable accommodation 
> to public participation.� After becoming a park commissioner, I pushed

> for and voted for televised meetings.� The move to our own 
> headquarters made it easier and cheaper to accomplish.� (We still 
> should do something about that boring back wall but I digress�..)
>
> �
>
> My apologies to Randall Cutting, et al, for not getting hooked up to 
> the electronic world until recently� �However, I have always been 
> available by phone, both land line (612-722-0370) and cell 
> (612-325-6149).� Anyone wishing to reach me without calling MPRB 
> headquarters could just look me up in the phone book.
>
>  I return all calls and answer all e-mails. Please do not hesitate to 
> contact me � your choice of technology � I look forward to hearing 
> from you.
>
> �
>
> Carol Kummer, District 5 Park Commissioner and candidate



REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to