I'm somewhat of an agnostic on the stadium deal, but the more I read about it the more I'm annoyed with how it's being spun in the media. My biggest annoyance? Carl Pohlad's "contribution" of $125m. If Pohlad was truly contributing that money out of his pocket, I'd be more inclined to support the concept. I love baseball, and it is a really small tax. (Don't get me wrong, I still struggle with this because I think there are other prioriies - such as proposals for a metro-wide .25 pct tax for transit).

What bugs me the most is reading that Pohlad owns the naming rights. I just read that the average received by pro teams for naming rights is $54.6m (the Wild are getting considerably more for the Xcel Center so I'd consider the $54.6 to be a low estimate as to what Pohlad gets). I'd say, roughly, half of his "contribution" is coming from naming rights.

If the media would tell us that clearly that'd be one thing. Maybe that's been covered well in more in-depth stories and I've missed it, but I consider the repeated statement of Pohlad's "contribution" to be a snow-job.

Jim McGuire
Como

Check out the Usual Suspects Blog - http://www.browncross.com/usualsuspects

REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to