More can be discussed offline for interested parties, but I did make the distinction of TRI emissions and not "criteria emissions". Toxic Release Inventory figures are different than the figures reported to the MPCA and relate to substances known to cause negative human health effects. For the incinerator the types of substances reported would be compounds like mercury and dioxin. Here is where you can search point facilities' toxic emissions. http://www.epcra.state.mn.us/
I oppose the use of tax revenue for the stadium. If people are willing to pay pennies on the dollar then I think that there are a myriad of other issues that could be addressed first, such as:
"Clean energy tax" --$353 million could build enough renewable energy for the City (wind/solar) to offset a coal-fired power plant like Riverside (peaking plant) for good.
"Health-care tax" -- could prevent Minneapolis/Hennepin County residents from getting kicked of MN Care or other programs.
"Libraries tax" -- could actually keep the libraries in the City open more than 3 days a week.
I'm sure others could add to the list (NRP funding for example). After hearing my friend in Charlotte, NC explain to me how their city was left holding the bag once the Hornets left and now (apparently not learning their lesson) they are building a new stadium for the expansion team--Bobcats--with city revenue. The new stadium will open Dec 12th with a U2 concert, the old stadium (< 20 years old) will be sold to a group of investors for demolition.
Justin Eibenholzl Armatage
From: David Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Mpls] Re: stadium Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 06:56:31 -0500
Giving credit where credit is due...
On May 2, 2005, at 2:17 PM, Justin Eibensteiner wrote:
Regarding the burner's plume...
The basic point of contention is that the studies are theoretical and not empirical. <snip>
Since none of this work has been done, the public has no way of gauging their exposure based on on any real data.
Absolutely right. The only study was modeling done before HERC opened. While I'm not aware of a detailed critique of that modeling, there is no study of actual emission dispersal, so I concede Justin's point and will be more circumspect about future claims of where stuff ends up.
If you check with Minneapolis Environmental Management you'll find that the incerator pollution controls fail from time to time (to the point of getting fined significantly), meaning anyone in the vicinity may be getting more bad air then they bargained for on the wrong day.
I checked. The last HERC failure was in 1999 - a scrubber failure that lasted less than a day, causing a hydrogen chloride violation. The plant was fined $22,000. Since then - more than six years - no violations or failures. I think the odds are with the fans here.
Another bonus for the incinerator is due to the fact they are considered a waste treatment facility they do not have to disclose their emissions to the Toxic Release Inventory--creating even less public transparency.
The plant does report emissions, which are publicly available, as noted earlier. I don't think there's anything furtive here.
Fundamentally, I think the burner argument is a red herring in this debate. It's easy to fixate on a high-profile point source that probably pumps out less harmful junk than the tailpipes of the cars fans drive to the game - and certainly than a coal-fired plant, of which there are several in the Twin Cities.
David Brauer Kingfield
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
REMINDERS: 1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[email protected] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
