David Brauer  stated in an issues post:
"Peter's platform is more police and fire and permanent NRP funding. 
It's MUCH more exciting than R.T.'s * but the problem for this voter is 
that I still can't figure out how he can pay for it. All I've heard is 
a reliance on a one-time, $25 million pension plan that is dead, dead, 
dead at the legislature * and besides, as Mark Snyder astutely noted, 
the concept only pushes out the pension debt, where it gets bigger, 
rather than paying it off."

As the House author of the police pension legislation and much other pension  
legislation there is much to criticize in the city's handling of (and actions  
that caused) the various  pension problems and admittedly the city council 
deserves as much criticism as the mayor. But the mayor is responsible for 
taking a strong position in opposition. First of all the issue is not dead, 
dead, dead as the author proclaims. Just look at the House language to SF 427 
to see its reincarnation. The law would have been worth $24-40 million net 
present value on the life of the fund. By waiting a year the 2006 reduction in 
city pension costs will be about $15 million (loss of about 6 million). We do 
believe there is a negotiated agreement and a version of the bill we could have 
passed last year will now be passed. Perhaps the city convention shed some 
light on the issue. My major concern is to lessen the city's need to bond for 
pension payments. (Non tax exempt  bonds that will put a greater debt on the 
city in the future then the extended date for full funding of the fund). If we 
pass the pending pension legislation, this need may even disappear.

Phyllis Kahn  State Rep 59B
 
 

REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to