I agree with points made by Andy Discroll, former St. Paul Human Rights 
commissioner, in the email pasted below my closing. The testing / auditing to 
which 
Andy refers is often the only way to determine whether an employer weeds out 
prospective employees on the basis of race / ethnicity, and to determine 
whether tenants and home buyers are similarly weeded out or treated differently 
in 
the housing markets. That's why I propose that the Minneapolis Civil Rights 
Department be given the necessary resources and a mandate to do extensive 
testing / auditing in the job and housing markets, and to prosecute those who 
are 
found to be engaged in illegal, race-based discrimination.

And I am going to continue to point out that the Minneapolis School District 
and the MN Dept. of Education are not in compliance with the state 
desegregation rule, which requires that teachers in "racially isolated" schools 
(e.g., 
predominantly black student population) have qualifications and experience 
levels comparable to teachers in schools that are not racially identifiable.  
The 
district is in violation of title VI of the civil rights act of 1964, which 
requires school districts to monitor ability-grouping practices, which involves 
collecting and breaking down data that can show how grouping practices affect 
education related outcomes.

Doug Mann, King Field 
candidate for 8th ward city council
http://educationright.com/blog

Re: [Mpls] Employment and Race Correction
Andy Driscoll
Wed, 08 Jun 2005 19:25:37 -0700

If the results of this testing are as Dane related them, I, for one, have no 
reason to believe otherwise, these are clear cases of employment 
discrimination and subject to legal action. This is not a study, or a survey or 
a poll, 
it's a testing, something civil rights monitors in the Twin Cities as well as 
Milwaukee and other urban centers do all the time (and have done for 50 years) 
because it's often the only way to identify
companies (as with realtors and landlords in the housing arena) willing to
weed out potential employees based on their color.

And that's the point: that people who care about these issues will test the 
marketplace for signs of racial discrimination in violation of local and state 
human right laws in preparation for official complaints and, if necessary, 
punishment. The ultimate goal is to change behaviors or be penalized for 
breaking 
the law. Changing hiring practices to make them more color-blind (or 
gender-blind, etc.) is the ultimate goal because what we really want are jobs 
for 
traditionally excluded peoples based on everything but their qualifications to 
do 
the work required.
-
- 
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to