Michael Thompson wrote:

> There's a way around this: don't take out the loan. Or better your credit
> rating/score so you don't have to get a loan at an extravagant interest
> rate. I'm NOT saying deception is OK......... but if you can't understand
> the fine print, you shouldn't be signing.

I honestly don't know where I stand on this.  In general, I support
letting the market work.  Interest rates are set by the market, and it
seems that if the market were working properly, interest rates on loans
to people who don't have the highest credit scores would be high enough
to offset the higher risk those loans entail and no more.  Thus, there
wouldn't be any problems, and there wouldn't be a need for this ordinance.

But....there's something I can't quite put my finger on.  For one thing,
it's not necessarily right to think that the invisible hand is working
correctly here.  I think there's a reason that pretty much every major
world religion has laws against usury: because there are people who will
take advantage of people with less-than-stellar credit histories or
sophistication about banking.  They will do this for two reasons: first,
because this market isn't well-developed and so there isn't as much
competitive pressure.  Second, and more importantly, because when you
screw the little guys, they can't complain.

I do think that it is wrong to send people the message that one of the
best ways to improve their neighborhoods and improve their financial
standing is to purchase the house that they live in, and then take from
them the ability to do so by allowing subprime lenders to take advantage
of them.  You say that people who don't understand the fine print
shouldn't be signing anything in the first place.  Yes, that's correct.
 That's also not terribly realistic, nor do I think it is the moral
thing to do.  In an ideal world, our schools would be teaching economics
to students so they know this stuff, but it seems like they have enough
trouble with basic math and reading.

Even if schools became perfect tomorrow in this regard, though, it
wouldn't do much for those adults right now who don't know much about
finance.  To say that they shouldn't sign anything if they don't
understand that is to relegate them to perpetual uselessness.  It's like
saying, "You don't understand that contract because you are illiterate?
 Well, then don't enter into any contracts.  Good luck with life."
That's not empowering people to become better, and helping people help
themselves is something I believe in.

I am somebody who has a good credit rating and who worked hard to get
it.  I don't have any credit card debt because I have not given in to
the "buy now/pay later" mentality so prevalent in our materialistic
culture.  I've also had pretty steady employment and health insurance to
guard against going into debt.  But I also know that as a middle-class
white kid growing up in suburbia, I have a lot of things already going
my way that many people don't.  I'm proud of what I have done, but at
the same time I'm not going to sit back and tell everybody else to pull
themselves up by their bootstraps before I will consider how to help
them.  Because in the long run, I think the damage from predatory
lending outweighs the benefits of whatever profits banks might get from
the practice.

Whether we need this kind of ordinance is a good question.  If this has
been tried in other municipalities, and it sounds like it has, I think
we need to know what has happened.  Has predatory lending diminished?
Has homeownership risen?  Have banks pulled out of markets entirely in
protest?  If these ordinances don't have any measurable benefits, then
it would be pointless to pass one here.  If, however, they do correct a
market aberration with minimal cost, then I think the benefits to the
community would make it worth our while.  Allowing people to own their
own homes without an unfair, crushing debt burden seems to me like the
right thing to do.

-- 
Nathan Hunstad
CARAG
Minneapolis, MN
PGP DH/DSS public key -- http://www.angelfire.com/mn/freakpower/nhpubkey.txt
________________________________________________
Do you Gonzo?!
http://www.angelfire.com/mn/freakpower
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to