Ken Bradley wrote:
Additional analysis from the Minnesota Department of Education website;
demographics information for south-side schools.

Southwest

54.59% White, 18.11% Black, Hispanic 21.59%, Asian 4.34%, Native 1.34%

45.38% Students of color

Washburn 

49.14% Black, 33.76% White, 8.93% Asian, 6.53% Hispanic, 1.65% Native


66.16% Students of color


Roosevelt

Black 50.21%, White 21.65%, Asian 12.79%, Hispanic 11.83%, Native 3.53%


78.36% Students of color
South

52.62% White, Black 26.29%, Asian 8.29%, Hispanic 6.4%, Native 6.4%

47.38% Students of color

Most my son's friends parents that are white expressed that their first
choice for high school was Southwest, second South, and Washburn third. I
don't believe all of these parent's are racist, but the above data clearly
shows a segregated school system, and students of color are getting the
short end of the stick, as shown by the test scores. Have neighborhood
schools benefited students of color? Can someone show me data that will
prove it has helped these students?

<snip>

So it seems to me that our Neighborhood School experiment has created a
certain amount of segregation. Parents of white children, and parents of
children of color, may be happy with having their children closer to home,
but we have to be honest that it has created a more segregated school
system.

Mark Anderson replies:
I am confused by this posting.  Ken, you are implying that the racial
composition of the high schools in South Mpls is a product of neighborhood
schools.  But the high schools are not neighborhood schools, and haven't
been for a long time.  When Mpls moved to the neighborhood school concept
about 9 years ago, the high schools weren't affected.  Any 9th grader in
Mpls can go to any high school in Mpls.  If you neglect to pick a high
school, they will throw you into your "home" school, which is a neighborhood
school concept.  But I think most kids do pick a school.  If that wasn't the
case, there would be a very small minority of Whites at South, instead of
the 53% you quote above.

In elementary and middle schools, on the other hand, community schools are
very important.  Based on my unscientific knowledge of my neighborhood, it
appears that a majority of the kids in my neighborhood go to the community
elementary and middle schools, but a much smaller percentage goes to the
"Home" high school.

I really do like the concept of community schools.  My kids can have the
same friends in school and around the neighborhood.  It is much easier for
the parents to get to know the teachers when the school is close-by.  I'm
not sure if academics suffer in a community school, but academics aren't
everything.  It's as important for my kids to have continuity in their
friends and neighborhood as it is to learn the three R's.

It does seem that the magnet schools do better academically.  I've come to
the conclusion that this has nothing to do with the programs they have, or
the kids that enroll there (a much higher proportion of White kids I think).
It is simply because of much higher involvement of the parents.  Every kid
is in a magnet school because the parents took the trouble to sign him/her
up to go there.  My wife and I specifically decided we'd like our kids to go
to our local community elementary school.  But an awful lot of the parents
seem to be completely oblivious to how the school system works, and all
their kids also end up in the community schools.  Unfortunately these same
parents are often oblivious to what their kids are doing in school, and a
lot of those kids are not successful.

You may have noticed what sounds like a contradiction in my discussion
above; in one place I guessed that most kids choose a high school, in
another I talked about the number of parents that are completely oblivious
to how the system works.  I have not reconciled this even in my own mind.
Maybe some of my guesses are wrong.  Does anyone know what proportions of
the school choice cards are actually used?  Is there a difference between
this proportion for kindergarten and for ninth grade?  I looked through the
Mpls School site, but didn't see any statistics on that.

Our community school, Bancroft Elementary, is highly segregated, but only
partially due to it being a community school.  When I walk around the
neighborhood, it appears to be about 50% White, yet my kids' classrooms have
been only about 5-10% White.  There are several reasons for this
differential.  First of all, despite being a community school, it is also a
magnet for Hmong.  There are very few Hmong in the neighborhood, but a lot
at the school.  Also, a pretty high proportion of the White kids go to
magnet schools.  I think the following are more minor reasons for "minority"
kids being so prevalent at the school: White families are usually smaller,
kids of White/Black marriages (of which there are a lot in this area) are
usually considered to be Black, and many adoptive parents are White with
non-White kids.  And maybe some other reasons that I'm not aware of.

I don't know the racial make-up of our community middle school, because we
decided not to send our son there.

Mark V Anderson
Bancroft


REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to