wmmarks wrote:
Chris Johnson wrote:
So the suggestion that the City sell the land under the houses to the
home owners at current market values as way to make things "fair to
all" is simply obfuscatory nonsense.
THIS IS CORRECTED VERSION
Obfuscatory (if that's a word) it may be. However, what we have is two
groups--those who live on the island and De LaSalle arguing for
primacy. Both sides are very privileged folks who basically want to
ride on the public dollar. If the MPRB is going to cede the issue to
de LaSalle, for whatever alleged reasons presented, then the school
needs to be charged at the cost the land is worth today. On the other
side, whether they put their own money into repairing houses/buildings
or not, they essentially improved land they do not own. The owner,
MPRB, needs to charge them fairly, at the same rate they would charge
the school if they set out to be fair (highly doubtful).
Personally, I think that if the MPRB owns the land de LaSalle wants,
it either has to keep the land in perpetuity as public land or charge
the school all the traffic will bear. Afterwards, they need to
renegotiate with the building owners for the use of public
land--something realistic, not the give away they are presently
operating under.
WizardMarks, Central
Sorry for the big mistake
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
