This is the first time I've posted on the Minneapolis Forum so hopefully
I do it right. The back and forth between the List Manager and Mr.
Graham seems to be mostly about the "sock puppet" comment. Which seems
to me fairly innocous.
I'm more concerned with Mr. Graham's use of the "shot at" anaology. He
stated several times that he felt a public figure was ripe for being
"shot at." With the violence seemingly ruling this society, more and
more frequently, all over, locally and globally, I would hope that we
can utilize language that does not encourage violent thought.
Bring on the sock puppets and get rid of the violent language.
Caty Royce, Bancroft
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
