Don Johnson, Candidate for Mayor wrote:

> There are several varieties of elms in the US. Some are indigenous,
> others are from northern Europe. Some grow as high as 100 feet.

RC: This is true.  I never said anything that would contradict this.  What
I said is that a majority (if not all) Minneapolis boulevard trees are
American Elms and that there is no variety known of as a Dutch Elm.  There
are in fact Elm trees in the Netherlands - which I assume was the source
of the fungus that causes Dutch Elm Disease.


> Cutting is probably
> not old enough to remember when a tornado blew thru  Minneapolis in 1980.

RC: I'm not exactly sure what this sentence is trying to imply.  Is Mr.
Johnson trying to imply that people shouldn't consider what I wrote
because I may be young?

As an aside, I do remember the storms.  I have friends who lost all their
shingles in that storm.  I also lived in a house several years ago that
was damaged when, on a calm day, a boulevard elm tipped over due to rotten
bole wood.


> Several homes were heavily damaged and one person actually died when a
> tree fell on him.

RC: I did not recall that someone died, but that certainly is a tragedy.


> The too tall decorative elms provide shade but any tree can provide
> shade.

RC: I agree any tree can provide shade, but not all provide the same
"quality and quantity" of shade.  Moreover, there are more considerations
than just height and shade that need to be considered when planting a tree
(as you point out with a desire to have edible fruit/nuts/etc).

Maple, for example, can cause an immense amount of infrastructure damage
due to the root system destroying sidewalks, curbs, and street surfaces. 
We, the tax payers, will have to repair and replace this infrastructure.

>From a public safety point of view, American Elms were ideal.  Their tall,
vase shaped form allowed street lights to easily illuminate large areas of
our streets.  Many of the new trees being planted block much of the street
light providing excellent hiding places for criminals.  So we have three
options (1) passively accept the increased risk of harm by criminals, (2)
turn on our home's exterior lights to make up for the street light shading
- thus using more power, or (3) pay for existing street lights to be
replaced with lower, pedestrian-scale lighting (ok I personally like this
option, but those on limited income may not).


> The elm was over planted.

RC: I completely agree, the American Elm was over planted.  I wish our
city would have recognized the need for a diverse urban forest long ago. 
I wish they wouldn't have planted so many American Elms but instead would
have planted a wide variety of trees appropriate for the unique
difficulties of the urban landscape.  I wish they would have developed the
city infrastructure to better accommodate a wider variety of trees by
building narrower streets with wider boulevards and pedestrian scale
lighting everywhere.  I wish that the street car system that existed in
1920 was still in service today, complete with the brick roads that
allowed the infiltration of stormwater.  I wish that all the houses in the
city built from the 1880's through the 1940s were fully insulated thus
making shading the home for energy efficiency was less necessary. But none
of these things happened.


> About 85% of homes in Minneapolis are
> ineligible for the grant money for solar energy the state offers because
> of trees that are too tall and shade the houses.

RC: Wow, that's a lot considering how many American Elms have been lost to
Dutch Elm Disease.  I'll bet that is really distressing to Mr. Johnson as
it dramatically limits his potential pool of customers for his solar
business.  I do wonder though how much worse the urban heat island would
be if all these homes had completely exposed roofs.  We would really need
the extra solar energy to make up for the dramatically increased need for
air conditioning.

To be honest, however, I do wish that the roof of every large commercial,
industrial, and institutional building was completely covered with solar
panels.  I do also wish that the 15% of homes in Minneapolis that are
eligible for grant money would install solar panels.  I also wish that the
grants were more flexible so that people like me, with my shaded home,
could get a grant to put panels on my unshaded garage.


> We desperately need edible landscapes. Our streets boulevards, parks and
> yards should have more fruit trees. Instead we ship in fruit from  all
> parts of
> the world in refrigerated trucks, planes, trains and ships. This produces
> megatons of greenhouse gasses.

RC: I agree we need more edible landscapes, I grew up in a household with
an apple tree, raspberries, strawberries, and a majority of the yard
planted with a vegetable garden.  A friend of mine grew up in a house with
an Oak tree, we ate Acorn pancakes a few times when we were young.  Edible
landscapes are great things on one's personal property where the homeowner
does the work and has the responsibility for maintenance.  I do still
believe that when it comes to our boulevard trees, our urban foresters
should have the last word.  It may be appropriate for some trees with
edible fruit/nuts to be planted on public property throughout our city,
but it should be up to foresters (who know what an American Elm is) to
select appropriate trees for appropriate sites after taking into
consideration all the factors they need to consider.

As an aside, I do eat fruit that is shipped into Minneapolis.  I purchase
ALL of my fruit from two sources (1) the Seward Co-op and Deli and (2)
FruitShare CSA and neither of them have fruit trees in the city.


> This is just one of the eco-tactics we must use to
> try to slow global calamity and let's hope and pray that the warming of
> the planet is not too much of a geometric progression. More at my web
> site.

RC: "Just one"?  You brought up three: edible landscapes, solar
technology, and global warming or were you referring to your proposal to
bulldoze all the large trees in Minneapolis?

Randall Cutting
Seward







REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to