Our Current Development Process: Money Talks

  Fed up with big money controlling their local elections, citizens of 
Albuquerque, New Mexico voted 2 to 1 in favor of an Open and Ethical Elections 
Code - making it the first city in the country to pass a clean elections 
referendum. 

  Here in Minneapolis, we've read the headlines about an FBI investigation of a 
sitting City Council member for allegedly accepting money from developers in 
exchange for votes. But you don't need a federal wiretap to learn about the 
entanglement of developers with the Council - simply peruse the lists of 
campaign contributors.

  With a two-term incumbent council member, parcels of land ripe for 
redevelopment along the new light rail line, and developers salivating to cash 
in on it, Minneapolis' 12th Ward has hit the trifecta for campaign sleaze. 
Council member Sandy Colvin Roy's 2005 Campaign Finance Report reveals 
thousands of dollars in contributions poured into her campaign from individuals 
employed by Klodt development's contractors. Over 26 of those contractors had a 
piece of Klodt's recently completed Oaks Hiawatha apartment building along the 
LRT. Now Klodt is rushing for city approval of the nearby massive Hiawatha 
Flats apartment complex

  Developers' money is drowning out residents' voices and trumping our city 
planners' professional advice. 

  Minneapolis may not quite have reached the point of Albuquerque, but we 
desperately need to reform how we finance municipal elections. This summer, the 
Star Tribune featured a Steve Berg commentary about how Vancouver bucked 
development trends to build a vibrant, healthy city with a focus on 
neighborhood-friendly, pedestrian-oriented development. In other words, we need 
reform not just because of ethical considerations, but because of the results 
we want to achieve.

  While the practice of city council candidates bankrolling their campaigns 
with developers' money is perfectly legal, it is plainly wrong and is also a 
bad way to do development. Continuing along this path will yield ill-planned 
development that doesn't fit the character of our neighborhoods, and increases 
traffic congestion and parking problems.

  Our city politics have become so entangled with the interests of developers 
that former Council President Dan Cohen believes a moratorium on new 
development is needed to give Minneapolis time to straighten out its campaign 
finance system.

  This is why, from the beginning of my campaign, I have pledged to reject 
campaign contributions from developers and their contractors doing business 
with the city. I am pushing to reform Minneapolis' ethical standards to 
encourage our elected officials to refrain from accepting contributions from 
developers. I want greater transparency in the reporting of campaign 
contributions. Foremost, I want the concerns of residents to be heard.

  Minneapolis was once regarded nationally as an oasis of clean politics and 
good government. Next month, we can rekindle this spirit by supporting 
candidates who are committed to cleaning up our elections and restoring 
community voices in guiding our city's redevelopment.

  -Kevin McDonald, independent candidate for Minneapolis City Council, Ward 12. 
He lives in the Hiawatha neighborhood.

  Strib article passed on by Dorie Rae Gallagher/Nokomis... Kevin McDonald 
supporter..new leadership is needed in our neighborhood!




REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to