T.Rob, sometimes MQ is very surreal ;-).
I mean somebody, who knows how is is designed and if the clustering "should work" as you described :-o. Or a document, where it is describe. T.Rob, did you test it with an actual version (CSD-10) ? Regards Hubert > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: MQSeries List [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] im Auftrag > von Wyatt, T Rob > Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2005 14:49 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: MQ Clustering question > > Hey David - does that make us "surreal" experts? ;-) > > -----Original Message----- > From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of Hubert Kleinmanns > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 8:46 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: AW: MQ Clustering question > > > T.Rob, David, > > I do not know, who is right. I would expect a behaviour as David > describes, > but I would be not very surprised, whe T.Rob is right. I am in doubt, > because MQ tries to find a way to the target QMgr. E. g. when you define a > remote queue without having a local tranmission queue and "normal" sender > / > receiver channel, but MQ "knows" a cluster channel to the target QMgr, the > message will be send using the cluster channel, although the remote queue > as > well as the target queue are NOT in any cluster. > > Maybe we need a "real" expert (like Paul Clarke ;-) ) to clarify the > situation. > > Regards > Hubert > > Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in > the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com > Archive: http://listserv.meduniwien.ac.at/archives/mqser-l.html Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://listserv.meduniwien.ac.at/archives/mqser-l.html
