Yesterday you sent me mail regarding [rrd-developers] Possible problem...: *> Ok, I think I understand the RRDs.xs problem I have. I'm trying to get *> a different recompile done to verify my theory. The theory is one of *> linking non PIC code into a shared object. This generally does not work. *> *> Let you know if that is what it turns out to be in the end. *> *> [Time passes]... *> *> Hmm, that does seem to be it. If I do --enable-shared, things seem *> to start working with the RRDs code. I think no matter if things *> are --enable-shared, or not, we should always be doing -fPIC (or *> whatever the systems equivelant is) for the static (and shared) *> libraries we generate. In that way, when we link up a RRDs, which *> is a shared object, we get PIC code...
hmmm ... so the question is only how do we get the beautiful libtool thing todo this PIC dance for us :-) thinking tobi *> *> --Toby. *> *> -- *> * To unsubscribe from the rrd-developers mailing list, send a message with the *> subject: unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *> *> -- ______ __ _ /_ __/_ / / (_) Oetiker, Timelord & SysMgr @ EE-Dept ETH-Zurich / // _ \/ _ \/ / TEL: +41(0)1-6325286 FAX:...1517 ICQ: 10419518 /_/ \.__/_.__/_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ee-staff.ethz.ch/~oetiker -- * To unsubscribe from the rrd-developers mailing list, send a message with the subject: unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
